Potentially avoidable admissions to general internal medicine at an academic teaching hospital: an observational
Alex M Cressman1, Ushma Purohit2, Ellen Shadowitz2
1Department of Medicine (Cressman, Purohit, Etchells, Weinerman, Gerson, Shojania, Stroud, Wong, S. Shadowitz), University of Toronto; Division of General Internal Medicine (Cressman, E. Shadowitz, Etchells, Weinerman, Shojania, Stroud, Wong, S. Shadowitz), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; The Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (Etchells, Weinerman, Shojania, Wong); Wilson Centre for Education Research (Stroud); Toronto, Ont. alex.cressman@mail.utoronto.ca.
Insights
A new screening method identified that 1 in 9 general internal medicine (GIM) admissions were potentially avoidable. This highlights opportunities for improving hospital resource allocation and patient care pathways.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Internal Medicine
- Hospital Administration
Background:
- Identifying potentially avoidable hospital admissions is a key healthcare system objective.
- General Internal Medicine (GIM) accounts for a significant portion (40%) of hospital admissions.
- Developing methods to identify and characterize these admissions is crucial for system improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a method for identifying potentially avoidable admissions within General Internal Medicine.
- To characterize patient, provider, and health system factors associated with these admissions.
Main Methods:
- An observational study of GIM admissions was conducted.
- A prospective screening and flagging system by staff physicians was implemented.
- Case reviews and debriefings were performed, with an avoidability score assigned to flag candidates.
Main Results:
- Out of 601 admissions screened, 11.1% were identified as potentially avoidable.
- Potentially avoidable admissions involved younger patients with fewer comorbidities and shorter lengths of stay.
- Common contributing factors included diagnostic uncertainty and system-level pressures.
Conclusions:
- A prospective screening and case review method effectively identified potentially avoidable GIM admissions.
- The findings suggest that 1 in 9 GIM admissions may be managed safely in alternative settings.
- This methodology can be adapted by other institutions to assess and reduce avoidable admissions.
Background:
Identifying potentially avoidable admissions to Canadian hospitals is an important health system goal. With general internal medicine (GIM) accounting for 40% of hospital admissions, we sought to develop a method to identify potentially avoidable admissions and characterize patient, provider and health system factors.
Methods:
We conducted an observational study of GIM admissions at our institution from August 2019 to February 2020. We defined potentially avoidable admissions as admissions that could be managed in an appropriate and safe manner in the emergency department or ambulatory setting and asked staff physicians to screen admissions daily and flag candidates as potentially avoidable admissions. For each candidate, we prepared a case review and debriefed with members of the admitting team. We then reviewed each candidate with our research team, assigned an avoidability score (1 [low] to 4 [high]) and identified contributing factors for those with scores of 3 or more.
Results:
We screened 601 total admissions and staff physicians flagged 117 (19.5%) of these as candidate potential avoidable admissions. Consensus review identified 67 candidates as potentially avoidable admissions (11.1%, 95% confidence interval 8.8%-13.9%); these patients were younger (mean age 65 yr v. 72 yr), had fewer comorbidities (Canadian Institute for Health Information Case Mix Group+ 0.42 v. 1.14), had lower resource-intensity weighting scores (0.72 v. 1.50) and shorter hospital lengths of stay (29 h v. 105 h) (p < 0.01). Common factors included diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty, perceived need for short-term monitoring, government directive of a 4-hour limit for admission decision-making and subspecialist request to admit.
Interpretation:
Our prospective method of screening, flagging and case review showed that 1 in 9 GIM admissions were potentially avoidable. Other institutions could consider adapting this methodology to ascertain their rate of potentially avoidable admissions and to understand contributing factors to inform improvement endeavours.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
05:15Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Healthcare Associated Infections I: Iatrogenic, Exogenic and Endogenic
HAIs significantly increase the cost of health care. Extended stays in healthcare institutions, increased disability, increased costs of medications, including specialized antibiotics, and prolonged recovery times add to the patient's expenses and the healthcare institution and funding bodies.
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
