Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Two simple-to-use web-based nomograms to predict overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with
Yubo Li1, Jianing Yang1, Long Zhao1
1Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China.
Background:
Fibrosarcoma is a rare sarcoma of the soft tissue in adults, occurring most commonly in the extremities. This study aimed to construct two web-based nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with extremity fibrosarcoma (EF) and validate it with multicenter data from the Asian/Chinese population.
Method:
Patients with EF in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015 were included in this study and were randomly divided into a training cohort and a verification cohort. The nomogram was developed based on the independent prognostic factors determined by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was validated with the Harrell's concordance index (C-index), receiver operating curve, and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was utilized to compare the clinical usefulness between the novel model and the existing staging system.
Result:
A total of 931 patients finally were obtained in our study. Multivariate Cox analysis determined five independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, namely, age, M stage, tumor size, grade, and surgery. The nomogram and the corresponding web-based calculator were developed to predict OS (https://orthosurgery.shinyapps.io/osnomogram/) and CSS (https://orthosurgery.shinyapps.io/cssnomogram/) probability at 24, 36, and 48 months. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.784 in the training cohort and 0.825 in the verification cohort for OS and 0.798 in the training cohort and 0.813 in the verification cohort for CSS, respectively, indicating excellent predictive performance. The calibration curves showed excellent agreement between the prediction by the nomogram and actual outcomes. Additionally, the results of DCA showed that the newly proposed nomogram was significantly better than the conventional staging system with more clinical net benefits. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients assigned into the low-risk group had a more satisfactory survival outcome than the high-risk group.
Conclusion:
In this study, we constructed two nomograms and web-based survival calculators including five independent prognostic factors for the survival prediction of patients with EF, which could help clinicians make personalized clinical decisions.
