Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

PD Controller: Design01:26

PD Controller: Design

310
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
310
Controller Configurations01:22

Controller Configurations

134
Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...
134
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

333
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
333
Control Systems: Applications01:25

Control Systems: Applications

679
Electrical engineering plays a pivotal role in our daily lives, with control systems at the heart of many applications, from home appliances to sophisticated space shuttles. Control systems manage and regulate the behavior of devices and processes, ensuring they function safely, correctly, and efficiently.
In modern vehicles, control systems manage various functions to enhance performance and safety. The steering wheel and accelerator are primary inputs in a car's control system. The...
679
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

137
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence...
137
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of Arizona's statewide handheld cellphone ban using roadside observation and telematics data.

Journal of safety research·2026
Same author

Decision support for partial automation: Driver behavior and trust with different versions of automated lane change.

Journal of safety research·2026
Same author

Behavior change associated with using partial automation among three samples of drivers during a 4-week field trial.

Journal of safety research·2025
Same author

Applying the Health Belief Model to mobile device distracted driving.

Journal of safety research·2025
Same author

The maximum potential benefits of safety systems on light van crashes in the United States.

Journal of safety research·2025
Same author

Convenience or safety system? Crash rates of vehicles equipped with partial driving automation.

Traffic injury prevention·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.5K

Consumer demand for partial driving automation and hands-free driving capability.

Alexandra S Mueller1, Jessica B Cicchino1, Joseph V Calvanelli2

  • 1Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington VA, United States.

Journal of Safety Research
|March 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Drivers desire partial driving automation like lane centering, but prefer hands-on control. Consumer acceptance of automated lane change and driver monitoring varies, with a need for designs deterring misuse.

Keywords:
Auto lane changeDriver monitoringLane centeringLevel 2Public opinion

More Related Videos

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

17.5K
Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.5K
Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

17.5K
Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Consumer Behavior

Background:

  • Consumer interest in partial driving automation is high, but research on specific features like hands-free driving, automated lane changes, and driver monitoring is limited.
  • Understanding public demand is crucial for developing and implementing these advanced vehicle technologies safely.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore consumer demand for various aspects of partial driving automation, including lane centering, automated lane change, and driver monitoring.
  • To investigate user preferences for hands-on versus hands-free operation and driver-initiated versus vehicle-initiated automation.

Main Methods:

  • An internet-based survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 1,010 U.S. adult drivers.
  • The survey assessed demand, comfort levels, and preferences for different partial driving automation features and their associated safety mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Eighty percent of drivers want lane centering, with a preference for hands-on (36%) over hands-free (27%).
  • Over half of drivers are comfortable with driver monitoring, linked to perceived safety benefits and proper technology use.
  • While 73% would use automated lane change, most prefer it to be driver-initiated (45%) and require hands-on operation (over 75%).

Conclusions:

  • Consumers show interest in partial driving automation but resist highly automated functions, particularly vehicle-initiated automated lane change.
  • Design strategies must deter misuse, and consumer education is vital for safe adoption of driver monitoring and other safeguards.