Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses
Johnny van Doorn1, Frederik Aust1, Julia M Haaf1
1Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Valckeniersstraat 59, 1018 XA Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentaries (partially) addressed these initial questions. Surprisingly perhaps, the experts disagreed (often strongly) on what is best practice-a testament to the intricacy of conducting a mixed effect model comparison. Here, we provide our perspective on these comments and highlight topics that warrant further discussion. In general, we agree with many of the commentaries that in order to take full advantage of Bayesian mixed model comparison, it is important to be aware of the specific assumptions that underlie the to-be-compared models.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Factorial Design
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Biostatistics: Overview
Discrete variables are...
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

