Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025
![Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F62334.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
T1 and T2 Mapping for Characterization of Mediastinal Masses: A Feasibility study
Kyongmin S Beck1, Suyon Chang1, Kwanyong Hyun2
1Department of Radiology, Catholic University of Korea, Banpo-daero, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of T1 and T2 mapping in characterization of mediastinal masses. Methods: From August 2019 through December 2021, 47 patients underwent 3.0-T chest MRI with T1 and post-contrast T1 mapping using modified look-locker inversion recovery sequences and T2 mapping using a T2-prepared single-shot shot steady-state free precession technique. Mean native T1, native T2, and post-contrast T1 values were measured by drawing the region of interest in the mediastinal masses, and enhancement index (EI) was calculated using these values. Results: All mapping images were acquired successfully, without significant artifact. There were 25 thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), 3 schwannomas, 6 lymphomas, and 9 thymic cysts, and 4 other cystic tumors. TET, schwannoma, and lymphoma were grouped together as "solid tumor," to be compared with thymic cysts and other tumors ("cystic tumors"). The mean post-contrast T1 mapping (P < .001), native T2 mapping (P < .001), and EI (P < .001) values showed significant difference between these two groups. Among TETs, high risk TETs (thymoma types B2, B3, and thymic carcinoma) showed significantly higher native T2 mapping values (P = .002) than low risk TETs (thymoma types A, B1, and AB). For all measured variables, interrater reliability was good to excellent (intraclass coefficient [ICC]: .869∼.990) and intrarater reliability was excellent (ICC: .911∼.995). Conclusion: The use of T1 and T2 mapping in MRI of mediastinal masses is feasible and may provide additional information in the evaluation of mediastinal masses.

