Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025
Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
Preservation versus resection of middle turbinate in endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery
Muaid I Aziz Baban1, Sahar J Hadi2, Abbas A Mahmoud3
1Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Sulaimani, College of Medicine, Sulaymaniyah Teaching Hospital, Sulaymaniyah 46001, Kurdistan, Iraq; Unit of Skull base Surgery, Shar Teaching Hospital, Sulaymaniyah 46001, Kurdistan region, Iraq.
Background:
The strategic position of the middle turbinate (MT) within the nasal cavity makes it the first kick start to resect pituitary pathology through Endoscopic Transnasal Transsphenoidal Surgery (ETTS). This research aimed to determine if the type of endonasal endoscopic approach, MT resection (MTres) versus MT preservation (MTpre), for pituitary surgery affects olfaction and sinonasal function within a subjective as well as objective manner.
Patients & Methods:
A prospective cohort comparative study was conducted to compare the sinonasal and olfaction outcomes pre and post operatively for both groups. Sinonasal symptoms were evaluated subjectively by Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), while objectively by Peri-Operative Sinus Endoscope Score (POSE) along with Lund-Mackay radiological scoring system (LMS), and a Sniffin Sticks Identification test (SIT) (Burghart, Germany) was used to measure the olfaction intensity. In both groups were used on a pre-operative period and after one, three, and six months post operatively.
Results:
96 patients were recruited within predetermined criteria. It is found that there are no significant differences in SIT between both groups with a ρ value 0.439 post operatively. The average change in score (delta) was an increase of 0.3, with changes ranging from -3 to +4. There was no significant difference in sinonasal symptoms score among both groups, with ρ 0.07 posts operatively. There was a minor upsurge in POSE score and LMS in the preservation group but without remarkable differences with ρ value 0.1 and 0.2 subsequently. It is found that there are no significant differences in SIT between both groups with a ρ value 0.439 post operatively.
Conclusion:
Despite these amendments to the nasal cavity, we approved that these changes do not affect the sinonasal functions.
