Real-world evaluation of amblyopic patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and treatment patterns using the IRIS
Euna B Koo1, Lauren A Wiener2, Annie Syntosi3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Purpose:
To characterize the demographics, eye-related comorbidities, clinical characteristics, clinical outcomes, type of amblyopia tests used, and treatment patterns of a large cohort of pediatric, teenage, and adult amblyopic patients from the IRIS (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry.
Methods:
In this retrospective electronic health record analysis, we analyzed 456,818 patients, of whom 197,583 (43.3%) were pediatric patients; 65,308 (14.3%), teenagers; and 193,927 (42.5%), adults. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity examination in both eyes was conducted within 90 days prior to index date. Three age cohorts were analyzed based on age at the index date: pediatric (3-12 years), teen (13-17 years), and adult (18-50 years).
Results:
At index date, unilateral amblyopia was more common than bilateral amblyopia in all age cohorts (pediatric, 55% vs 45%; teen, 61% vs 39%; adult, 63% vs 37%). In unilateral amblyopic patients, severe amblyopia was more frequent in adults (21%) than in pediatric patients (12%) and teenagers (13%); in bilateral amblyopic patients, severity was comparable in pediatric patients and adults (4% severe in both). The greatest level of visual acuity improvement was demonstrated in pediatric patients with severe unilateral amblyopia at baseline. Pediatric patients showed significant improvement in stereopsis over time at years 1 (P = 0.000033) and 2 (P = 0.000039) at the population level (per χ2 test vs baseline).
Conclusions:
Our findings highlight the need for more efficacious amblyopia therapies in older, more severe patients with refractory disease.
