Transition Zone
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

High Temperature Fabrication of Nanostructured Yttria-Stabilized-Zirconia YSZ Scaffolds by In Situ Carbon Templating Xerogels
Published on: April 16, 2017
Masanao Inokoshi1, Hengyi Liu1, Kumiko Yoshihara2
1Department of Gerodontology and Oral Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan.
This study compares two commercial multilayer zirconia systems used in dental restorations. The researchers examined how layer composition affects mechanical and optical properties. They found that enamel layers have higher translucency but lower strength due to higher monoclinic zirconia content. Body layers showed significantly higher flexural strength. The study also found that interfaces between layers do not act as weak points. The strength-gradient design allows for balancing aesthetics and mechanical performance in dental applications.
06:49Radio Frequency Magnetron Sputtering of GdBa2Cu3O7âˆ'ÃŽ ´/ La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 Quasi-bilayer Films on SrTiO3 STO Single-crystal Substrates
Published on: April 12, 2019
08:29Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)
Published on: January 7, 2019
Area of Science:
Background:
Current research on dental ceramics focuses on optimizing mechanical and optical properties to meet clinical demands. Prior research has shown that yttria-stabilized zirconia (Y-ZrO₂) is widely used for dental restorations due to its high strength and aesthetic potential. However, a gap remains in understanding how layer composition influences overall performance. This paper addresses that uncertainty by examining two commercial multilayer zirconia systems. The study builds on established knowledge of zirconia phase transformations and their impact on mechanical behavior. It introduces a novel approach to layer-specific property analysis. This work does not propose new fabrication techniques but investigates existing commercial products. The study contributes to the field by quantifying how layer composition affects translucency and strength. It also explores whether interlayer interfaces compromise structural integrity.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this work is to compare the crystallography, translucency, phase content, microstructure, and flexural strength of two commercial strength-gradient multilayered zirconia grades. The specific problem is to determine how layer composition influences mechanical and optical properties in dental applications. The motivation stems from the need to balance translucency and strength in dental restorations. The authors sought to evaluate whether layer interfaces act as weak points in the material. The study does not aim to develop new materials but to analyze existing ones. It focuses on how yttria content affects phase composition and mechanical behavior. The goal is to assess whether the strength-gradient design successfully integrates conflicting properties. This work provides insights into how commercial multilayer zirconia systems perform under mechanical stress.
Main Methods:
The study used two commercial zirconia grades: KATANA Zirconia YML and IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime. Fully sintered square-shaped specimens from each layer were prepared for analysis. Microstructural and chemical composition characterization was performed using standard techniques. Translucency parameters were measured to assess optical properties. Phase composition was analyzed to determine monoclinic and tetragonal zirconia content. Four-point and biaxial flexural strength tests were conducted on bar- and square-shaped specimens. The biaxial test evaluated strength across layer interfaces. The four-point test focused on individual layer properties. The study does not involve new fabrication methods but uses existing commercial materials.
Main Results:
The enamel layer of both zirconia grades had higher c-ZrO₂ content, resulting in increased translucency but reduced flexural strength. The YML body 2 and body 3 layers showed 4-point flexural strengths of 923 MPa and 911 MPa, respectively. The Prime body layer reached 989 MPa, significantly higher than the enamel layer at 535 MPa. The YML enamel layer had the lowest strength at 634 MPa. The biaxial strength of cross-layer specimens was intermediate between enamel and body layers. This suggests that interfaces do not act as weak points in either system. The Prime transition layer showed 693 MPa, lower than the body but higher than the enamel. These findings indicate that yttria content directly affects phase composition and mechanical properties.
Conclusions:
The authors found that enamel layers in both systems had higher monoclinic zirconia content, which increased translucency but reduced strength. The body layers showed significantly higher flexural strength due to higher tetragonal zirconia content. The interface between layers did not act as a weak point, as biaxial strength was intermediate between enamel and body layers. The strength-gradient design successfully integrated layers with irreconcilable properties. The study does not propose new fabrication methods but confirms the effectiveness of existing commercial systems. The authors suggest that this approach allows for balancing aesthetics and mechanical performance in dental restorations. The findings support the use of strength-gradient multilayered zirconia in clinical applications.
The main outcome is that enamel layers in both zirconia systems have higher translucency but lower flexural strength compared to body layers.
Higher yttria content increases tetragonal zirconia content, which improves flexural strength but reduces translucency.
To determine if interfaces between layers act as weak points in the material structure.
They quantify the mechanical performance of individual layers under simulated clinical loading conditions.
Prime body layer reached 989 MPa, while YML body layers reached 923 MPa and 911 MPa.
It suggests that this design successfully integrates layers with conflicting properties like translucency and strength.