Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy reduces warm ischemia time and improves renal function acutely compared to...

Herein, we compared peri-operative and post-operative outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Various reviews of the current literature have detailed the lack of single-surgeon studies in this domain. Our study featured a single surgeon experienced in both approaches to reduce this bias seen in other multi-centre studies. We retrospectively analysed data from two hospitals to compare patient demographics, tumour characteristics, peri-operative and post-operative outcomes of all partial nephrectomies undertaken by a single surgeon with extensive experience in both approaches. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad prism software. Warm ischaemia time was significantly reduced in the robotic arm compared to the laparoscopic group. This translated into an improvement in acute renal function. Length of stay was also significantly reduced. This study highlights some benefits of robotic-assisted in comparison to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Further large-scale prospective studies would be valuable in confirming these findings and justifying their usage against their financial cost.