Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
Published on: July 26, 2024
Redefining Multimorbidity in Older Surgical Patients
Omar I Ramadan1,2, Paul R Rosenbaum2,3, Joseph G Reiter4
1From the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (Ramadan, Kelz).
Background:
Multimorbidity in surgery is common and associated with worse postoperative outcomes. However, conventional multimorbidity definitions (≥2 comorbidities) label the vast majority of older patients as multimorbid, limiting clinical usefulness. We sought to develop and validate better surgical specialty-specific multimorbidity definitions based on distinct comorbidity combinations.
Study Design:
We used Medicare claims for patients aged 66 to 90 years undergoing inpatient general, orthopaedic, or vascular surgery. Using 2016 to 2017 data, we identified all comorbidity combinations associated with at least 2-fold (general/orthopaedic) or 1.5-fold (vascular) greater risk of 30-day mortality compared with the overall population undergoing the same procedure; we called these combinations qualifying comorbidity sets. We applied them to 2018 to 2019 data (general = 230,410 patients, orthopaedic = 778,131 patients, vascular = 146,570 patients) to obtain 30-day mortality estimates. For further validation, we tested whether multimorbidity status was associated with differential outcomes for patients at better-resourced (based on nursing skill-mix, surgical volume, teaching status) hospitals vs all other hospitals using multivariate matching.
Results:
Compared with conventional multimorbidity definitions, the new definitions labeled far fewer patients as multimorbid: general = 85.0% (conventional) vs 55.9% (new) (p < 0.0001); orthopaedic = 66.6% vs 40.2% (p < 0.0001); and vascular = 96.2% vs 52.7% (p < 0.0001). Thirty-day mortality was higher by the new definitions: general = 3.96% (conventional) vs 5.64% (new) (p < 0.0001); orthopaedic = 0.13% vs 1.68% (p < 0.0001); and vascular = 4.43% vs 7.00% (p < 0.0001). Better-resourced hospitals offered significantly larger mortality benefits than all other hospitals for multimorbid vs nonmultimorbid general and orthopaedic, but not vascular, patients (general surgery difference-in-difference = -0.94% [-1.36%, -0.52%], p < 0.0001; orthopaedic = -0.20% [-0.34%, -0.05%], p = 0.0087; and vascular = -0.12% [-0.69%, 0.45%], p = 0.6795).
Conclusions:
Our new multimorbidity definitions identified far more specific, higher-risk pools of patients than conventional definitions, potentially aiding clinical decision-making.
Insights
New surgical multimorbidity definitions identify specific, high-risk patients, improving clinical decision-making. These specialty-specific criteria better predict mortality than conventional methods.
Area of Science:
- Geriatric Surgery
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Epidemiology
Background:
- Multimorbidity is common in surgical patients, negatively impacting outcomes.
- Conventional definitions (≥2 comorbidities) over-identify older patients, reducing clinical utility.
- Need for specialty-specific multimorbidity definitions based on distinct comorbidity combinations.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop and validate novel, specialty-specific multimorbidity definitions for surgical patients.
- Identify comorbidity combinations significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality.
- Assess the impact of hospital resources on outcomes for multimorbid patients.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Medicare claims data for patients aged 66-90 undergoing general, orthopaedic, or vascular surgery.
- Identified "qualifying comorbidity sets" linked to ≥1.5-fold increased 30-day mortality risk.
- Validated definitions using 2018-2019 data and analyzed differential outcomes by hospital resource levels.
Main Results:
- New definitions identified fewer multimorbid patients compared to conventional ones across all surgical types (e.g., vascular: 52.7% vs 96.2%).
- Higher 30-day mortality rates were observed with new definitions (e.g., vascular: 7.00% vs 4.43%).
- Better-resourced hospitals showed greater mortality benefits for multimorbid patients in general and orthopaedic surgery.
Conclusions:
- Novel multimorbidity definitions offer greater specificity and identify higher-risk patient pools.
- These refined definitions can enhance clinical decision-making in surgical care.
- Further research may explore tailored interventions based on these specific multimorbidity profiles.
More Related Videos
08:17A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration
Published on: February 27, 2018
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...