Promoting Evidence-Based Practice: The Influence of Novel Structural Change to Accelerate Translational
Miriam Rafferty1, Laura Stoff2, Justin D Smith3
1Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Objective:
To evaluate changes in clinicians' use of evidence-based practice (EBP), openness toward EBP, and their acceptance of organizational changes after a rehabilitation hospital transitioned to a new facility designed to accelerate clinician-researcher collaborations.
Design:
Three repeated surveys of clinicians before, 7-9 months, and 2.5 years after transition to the new facility.
Setting:
Inpatient rehabilitation hospital.
Participants:
Physicians, nurses, therapists, and other health care professionals (n=410, 442, and 448 respondents at Times 1, 2, and 3, respectively).
Interventions:
Implementation of physical (architecture, design) and team-focused (champions, leaders, incentives) changes in a new model of care to promote clinician-researcher collaborations.
Main Outcome Measures:
Adapted versions of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ), the Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS), and the Organizational Change Recipients' Beliefs Scale (OCRBS) were used. Open-ended survey questions were analyzed through exploratory content analysis.
Results:
Response rates at Times 1, 2, and 3 were 67% (n=410), 69% (n=422), and 71% (n=448), respectively. After accounting for familiarity with the model of care, there was greater reported use of EBP at Time 3 compared with Time 2 (adjusted meant2=3.51, standard error (SE)=0.05; adj. meant3=3.64, SE=0.05; P=.043). Attitudes toward EBPs were similar over time. Acceptance of the new model of care was lower at Time 2 compared with Time 1, but rebounded at Time 3 (adjusted meant1=3.44, SE=0.04; adj. meant2=3.19, SE=0.04; P<.0001; adj. meant3=3.51, SE=0.04; P<.0001). Analysis of open-ended responses suggested that clinicians' optimism for the model of care was greater over time, but continued quality improvement should focus on cultivating communication between clinicians and researchers.
Conclusions:
Accelerating clinician-researcher collaborations in a rehabilitation setting requires sustained effort for successful implementation beyond novel physical changes. Organizations must be responsive to clinicians' changing concerns to adapt and sustain a collaborative translational medicine model and allow sufficient time, probably years, for such transitions to occur.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Translational Regulation


