Basal and immune-responsive transcript expression of two Atlantic salmon interferon regulatory factor 2 (irf2)...

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is one of the most economically important aquaculture species globally. However, disease has become a prevalent threat to this industry. A thorough understanding of the genes and molecular pathways involved in the immune responses of Atlantic salmon is imperative for selective breeding of disease-resistant broodstock, as well as developing new diets and vaccines to mitigate the impact of disease. Members of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family of transcription factors play roles in the induction of interferons and other cytokines involved in host immune responses to intracellular and parasitic pathogens. IRF family members also play diverse roles in other biological processes, such as stress response, reproduction and development. The current study focused on one member of the IRF family: interferon regulatory factor 2 (irf2). As previously shown, due to the genome duplication that occurred ∼80 million years ago in the salmonid lineage, there are two irf2 paralogues in the Atlantic salmon genome. In silico analyses at the cDNA and deduced amino acid levels were conducted followed by phylogenetic tree construction with IRF2 amino acid sequences from various ray-finned fishes, cartilaginous fish and tetrapods. qPCR was then used to analyze paralogue-specific irf2 constitutive expression across 17 adult tissues, as well as responses to the viral mimic pIC (i.e., synthetic double-stranded RNA analog) in cultured macrophage-like cells (in vitro) and to infection with the Gram-negative bacterium Moritella viscosa in skin samples (in vivo). The qPCR studies showed sex- and paralogue-specific differences in expression across tissues. For example, expression of both paralogues was higher in ovary than in testes; expression (considering both sexes together) was highest for irf2-1 in gonad and for irf2-2 in hindgut. Both irf2 paralogues were responsive to pIC stimulation, but varied in their induction level, with irf2-1 having an overall stronger response than irf2-2. Only one paralogue, irf2-2, was significantly responsive to M. viscosa infection. Differences in irf2-1 and irf2-2 transcript expression levels constitutively across tissues, and in response to pIC and M. viscosa, may suggest neo- or subfunctionalization of the duplicated genes. This novel information expands current knowledge and provides insight into how genome duplication events may impact host regulation of important immune markers.