Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Randomized Trial of Facilitated Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy vs Sequential Fecal-Based Blood Test.
Ann G Zauber1, Sidney J Winawer2, Michael J O'Brien3
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Screening colonoscopy showed higher adherence than sequential fecal occult blood testing (HSgFOBT). Allowing crossover to colonoscopy improved detection of advanced neoplasia and serrated lesions (ADN-SERs) in HSgFOBT programs.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology and Oncology
- Clinical Trial Research
- Cancer Screening Modalities
Background:
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines recommend colonoscopy and high-sensitivity fecal occult blood testing (HSgFOBT), assuming similar effectiveness due to high adherence.
- Direct comparative data on adherence between screening colonoscopy and sequential HSgFOBT has been lacking.
- This study aimed to compare adherence and pathology findings between these two primary CRC screening methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare adherence rates between a single screening colonoscopy and sequential high-sensitivity fecal occult blood testing (HSgFOBT).
- To evaluate the detection of advanced neoplasia or large serrated lesions (ADN-SERs) based on adherence to each screening method.
- To assess the impact of crossover from HSgFOBT to colonoscopy on lesion detection.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial enrolled 3523 participants aged 40-69 years across three clinical settings.
- Participants were randomized to either a single screening colonoscopy or sequential HSgFOBT (4-7 rounds).
- Key metrics included initial and sequential adherence, follow-up colonoscopy rates, crossover to colonoscopy, and ADN-SER detection.
Main Results:
- Screening colonoscopy demonstrated higher initial adherence (83.6%) compared to one round of HSgFOBT (73.1%).
- Sequential adherence to HSgFOBT over four rounds was suboptimal (38.3%).
- ADN-SER detection was significantly higher in the colonoscopy arm (8.2%) compared to non-sequentially adherent HSgFOBT participants (0.6%), and improved with crossover to colonoscopy (5.5%).
Conclusions:
- Sequential HSgFOBT adherence is suboptimal compared to a single screening colonoscopy.
- Non-sequential HSgFOBT adherence leads to inferior detection of ADN-SERs compared to sequential adherence.
- Incorporating a crossover option to screening colonoscopy can enhance the effectiveness of HSgFOBT programs for detecting significant lesions.
Related Concept Videos
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

