Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

889
The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
889
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

742
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
742
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

228.0K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
228.0K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

797
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
797
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.4K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Affect Labeling and Reappraisal as an Emotion Regulation Strategy.

Affective science·2026
Same author

The costs and rewards of men's romantic dependence: A gendered perspective.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Blindness to minority absence.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

AI assists adversarial collaboration in debate on minority salience.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The cognitive underpinnings of minority overestimation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Measuring individual differences in the speed of attention using the distractor intrusion task.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

DeepMethylation: A deep learning framework for tissue-specific DNA methylation prediction and functional variant annotation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Redefining and estimating the early-phase reproduction ratio for epidemic outbreaks in spatially structured populations.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Exploring the structural lexicon of the Proteome via Metric Geometry.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Linking retinal sampling in neural encoding models to temporal profiles of visual processing in humans.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
07:13

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs

Published on: April 9, 2021

4.3K

Ten simple rules for socially responsible science.

Alon Zivony1,2, Rasha Kardosh3, Liadh Timmins4

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Plos Computational Biology
|March 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers can minimize social harm from studies by following 10 simple rules for socially responsible science. These guidelines address research design, reporting, and dissemination to prevent negative impacts on individuals and groups.

More Related Videos

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.0K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
07:13

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs

Published on: April 9, 2021

4.3K
Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.0K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Science Research Ethics
  • Scientific Integrity
  • Responsible Conduct of Research

Background:

  • Historically, research ethics focused on participant risk, neglecting indirect social harms.
  • Recent high-profile retractions highlight the need for guidance on socially responsible research.
  • Lack of awareness can lead motivated researchers to publish work with negative social consequences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the scarcity of resources for conducting socially responsible science.
  • To propose a framework for researchers to consider the social impact of their work.
  • To encourage reflection on researchers' social responsibility throughout the study lifecycle.

Main Methods:

  • Development of 10 simple rules for socially responsible science.
  • Rules cover the entire research lifecycle, from inception to dissemination.
  • Guidelines are intended as reflective tools, not a rigid code of conduct.

Main Results:

  • A set of 10 actionable rules designed to promote socially responsible scientific practices.
  • The rules provide a practical approach for researchers to mitigate potential negative social impacts.
  • The framework encourages proactive engagement with the societal implications of research.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing these rules can help researchers conduct science in a more socially responsible manner.
  • The proposed guidelines aim to foster greater awareness of research's broader societal effects.
  • Motivated scientists can utilize these rules to enhance the positive impact and minimize the harm of their research.