Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression
Published on: November 8, 2019
CuO-ZnO p-n junctions for accurate prediction of multiple volatile organic compounds aided by machine learning
Saraswati Kulkarni1, Ruma Ghosh1
1Electrical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Dharwad, Karnataka, 580011, India.
Abstract:
Detection and quantification of multiple volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emerging as critical requirements for several niche applications including healthcare. It is desirable to get multiple gases identified rapidly and using minimum number of sensors. Heterojunctions of metal oxides are still among the top-picks for efficient VOC sensing because they unfold exciting sensing characteristics in addition to enhanced response. This work reports the synthesis of nanostructures of CuO, ZnO, and three CuO-ZnO p-n junctions having different weight percentages (1-0.5, 1-1, and 0.5-1) of CuO and ZnO, using a facile one-pot hydrothermal method. The nanomaterials were characterized using X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, and UV-Visible spectroscopy. Resistive sensors were fabricated of all five nanomaterials and were tested for 25-200 ppm of four VOCs - isopropanol, methanol, acetonitrile, and toluene. The CuO and CuO-ZnO (1-0.5) sensors showed the highest response for isopropanol (7.5-65.3% and 19-122%, respectively) at 250 °C, CuO-ZnO (1-1) and CuO-ZnO (0.5-1) exhibited the highest responses for methanol (9-60%) and isopropanol (15-120%), respectively at 350 °C, and the intrinsic ZnO showed maximum response to toluene (29-76%) at 400 °C. All the sensing layers were observed to exhibit finite responses to the other three VOCs so, an attempt to classify and quantify the four VOCs accurately was made using support vector machine (SVM) and multiple linear regression (MLR) algorithms. The response and response times of two sensors were observed to be sufficient as inputs to the machine learning algorithms for classifying and quantifying all the four VOCs. The combinations of (CuO-ZnO (1-0.5) & (1-1) and CuO-ZnO (1-1) & (0.5-1) demonstrated the highest classification accuracy of 98.13% with SVM. The combination of CuO-ZnO (1-0.5) & (1-1) demonstrated the best quantification of the four VOCs using MLR.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
Classification of Titrimetric Analysis Based on Reaction Types
Titrations between an acid and a base lead to neutralization reactions that form...

