Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025
Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Airo® navigation versus freehand fluoroscopy technique: A comparative study of accuracy and radiological exposure for
L S Chatelain1, A Kourilsky1, G Lot1
1Fondation Rothschild, Department of Neurosurgery, 25-29, rue Manin, 75019 Paris, France.
Purpose:
The aim was to compare the accuracy of freehand fluoroscopy and CT based navigation on thoracolumbar screws placement and their respective effects on radiological exposure to the patient. No previous study directly compared the Airo® navigation system to freehand technique.
Methods:
In this monocentric retrospective study, 156 consecutive patients who underwent thoracolumbar spine surgery were included. Epidemiological data and surgical indications were noted. Heary classification was used for thoracic screws and Gertzbein-Robbins classification for lumbar screws. Radiological exposure was collected for each surgery.
Results:
A total of 918 screws were implanted. We analyzed 725 lumbar screws (Airo® 287; freehand fluoroscopy 438) and 193 thoracic screws (Airo® 49; freehand fluoroscopy 144). Overall, lumbar screws accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins grade A and B) was good in both groups (freehand fluoroscopy 91.3%; Airo® 97.6%; P<0.05). We found significantly less Grade B and C in the Airo® group. Thoracic accuracy was also good in both groups (Heary 1 and 2; freehand fluoroscopy 77.8%; Airo® 93.9%), without reaching statistical significance. Radiological exposure was significantly higher in the Airo® group with a mean effective dose of 9.69 mSv versus 0.71mSv for freehand fluoroscopy.
Conclusion:
Our study confirmed that the use of Airo® navigation yielded good accuracy. It however exposed the patient to higher radiological exposure compared with freehand fluoroscopy technique.
Level Of Evidence:
Level 3.
