A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction

Sara Alameddine1, Giulia Capannolo1, Giuseppe Rizzo2

  • 1Center for High-Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.

Insights

This study reviewed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for fetal growth restriction (FGR). Management recommendations varied significantly across the evaluated CPGs, indicating a need for standardization in FGR care.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Perinatology
  • Clinical Practice Guideline Analysis

Background:

  • Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a critical obstetric complication requiring standardized management strategies.
  • Existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for FGR management need systematic evaluation for quality and consistency.

Approach:

  • A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar) to identify FGR CPGs.
  • Twelve CPGs were critically assessed using the AGREE II tool, evaluating recommendations on diagnostic criteria, monitoring, and delivery timing.
  • Specific management elements analyzed included diagnostic criteria, growth charts, fetal surveillance frequency, and induction of labor protocols.

Key Points:

  • Significant heterogeneity exists in FGR diagnostic criteria, with varying definitions based on estimated fetal weight percentiles and longitudinal growth.
  • Fifty percent of CPGs recommended customized growth charts, while Doppler assessment frequencies for umbilical artery flow abnormalities were inconsistently reported.
  • Only three CPGs provided specific recommendations on the type of induction of labor to be employed.

Conclusions:

  • Published CPGs demonstrate considerable variability in managing pregnancies complicated by FGR.
  • The overall quality assessment using AGREE II yielded a mean score of 50%, suggesting room for improvement in guideline development and reporting.
  • There is a clear need for more consistent and evidence-based recommendations to standardize FGR management globally.
Abstract