Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

40.4K
Overview
40.4K
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.3K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.3K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.3K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.8K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.8K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

7.1K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

GA20ox1-mediated GA4 production promotes inflorescence stem growth in Arabidopsis via inner-layer cell proliferation.

Plant & cell physiology·2026
Same author

GWAS and Candidate Gene Prediction of Elemental Accumulation Traits in Rice Using a Multiparental Population.

Rice (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Good-eating-quality QTLs detected in two breeding populations by genome-wide association mapping increase eating quality of the Japanese rice cultivar 'Koshihikari'.

Breeding science·2026
Same author

Impact of Postoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index on Post-gastrectomy Outcomes in Older Adults With Gastric Cancer.

Anticancer research·2026
Same author

<i>N</i>-glucosylation of indole-3-acetyl amino acids modulates auxin metabolism and growth traits in <i>Oryza sativa</i>.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Subfamily-level comparative transcriptomics of key immune regulators in plants and suspension cells reveals novel rice blast resistance genes.

Plant & cell physiology·2026
Same journal

Coexistence of piRNA and KZFP defense systems: Evolutionary dynamics of layered defense against transposable elements.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Creation and manipulation of bipartite expression transgenes in C. elegans using phiC31 recombinase.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Inherited long telomeres induce a genome-wide transcriptional response in budding yeast.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.1K

GBScleanR: robust genotyping error correction using a hidden Markov model with error pattern recognition.

Tomoyuki Furuta1, Toshio Yamamoto1, Motoyuki Ashikari2

  • 1Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Chu-oh 2-20-1, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-0046, Japan.

Genetics
|March 29, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reduced-representation sequencing (RRS) generates cost-effective genotype data but suffers from errors. GBScleanR enhances accuracy by using marker-specific error rates in hidden Markov models (HMMs) for robust genotype correction.

Keywords:
error correctionhidden Markov modelimputationreduced-representation sequencing

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.2K
Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing
11:11

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

16.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.1K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.2K
Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing
11:11

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

16.9K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Reduced-representation sequencing (RRS) offers efficient genotyping but yields noisy data with significant errors.
  • Existing hidden Markov model (HMM) based error correction methods assume uniform error rates, failing to account for biases.
  • Allele read ratio bias arises from uneven fragment amplification and read mismapping in RRS data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce GBScleanR, a novel error correction tool for RRS genotype data.
  • To enhance genotype accuracy by incorporating marker-specific error rates into HMMs.
  • To provide a robust and precise method for correcting errors in noisy RRS data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of GBScleanR, an error correction tool utilizing HMMs.
  • Incorporation of marker-specific error rates to address biases in RRS data.
  • Validation using both simulation and real-world RRS genotype datasets.

Main Results:

  • GBScleanR significantly improves genotype accuracy, achieving up to a 25 percentage point increase compared to existing tools on simulated data.
  • The tool demonstrates reliable genotype estimation on real-world datasets, even with error-prone markers.
  • Marker-specific error rate incorporation leads to more precise error correction.

Conclusions:

  • GBScleanR offers a robust and precise solution for correcting errors in RRS-based genotype data.
  • The method effectively handles marker-specific biases, outperforming existing tools.
  • This tool enhances the reliability of genotype data derived from cost-effective sequencing platforms.