Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

776
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
776

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated Food Weight and Content Estimation Using Computer Vision and AI Algorithms: Phase 2.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

A Comparative Review of the SWEET Simulator: Theoretical Verification Against Other Simulators.

Journal of imaging·2024
Same author

Automated Food Weight and Content Estimation Using Computer Vision and AI Algorithms.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Train Station Pedestrian Monitoring Pilot Study Using an Artificial Intelligence Approach.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Qualification of the PAVIN Fog and Rain Platform and Its Digital Twin for the Evaluation of a Pedestrian Detector in Fog.

Journal of imaging·2023
Same author

SWEET: A Realistic Multiwavelength 3D Simulator for Automotive Perceptive Sensors in Foggy Conditions.

Journal of imaging·2023
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.0K

3D Object Detection for Self-Driving Cars Using Video and LiDAR: An Ablation Study.

Pascal Housam Salmane1, Josué Manuel Rivera Velázquez1, Louahdi Khoudour1

  • 1Cerema Occitanie, Research Team "Intelligent Transport Systems", 1 Avenue du Colonel Roche, 31400 Toulouse, France.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

High-cost 64-beam LiDAR is not essential for 3D object detection. The study shows that the sparse LiDAR and stereo fusion (SLS-Fusion) model

Keywords:
3D object detectionLiDARautonomous vehiclefusionstereo camera

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

592
Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.0K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

592
Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision and Robotics
  • Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Systems

Background:

  • High-precision 3D object detection often relies on expensive 64-beam LiDAR sensors (approx. $75,000).
  • Previous research introduced SLS-Fusion, a cost-effective method fusing low-cost four-beam LiDAR with stereo cameras, outperforming advanced stereo-LiDAR fusion techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the contribution of stereo and LiDAR sensors to the SLS-Fusion model's 3D object detection performance based on the number of LiDAR beams.
  • To quantify the stereo camera's role and its variation with respect to the number of LiDAR beams used in the fusion model.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed dividing the SLS-Fusion network into two independent decoder networks to evaluate the distinct contributions of LiDAR and stereo camera components.
  • Conducted experiments to assess the impact of varying LiDAR beam counts on the overall fusion model performance.

Main Results:

  • The stereo camera data significantly contributes to the SLS-Fusion model's performance.
  • Increasing the number of LiDAR beams beyond four showed no significant impact on the SLS-Fusion model's 3D object detection performance.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that cost-effective, lower-beam LiDAR sensors, when fused with stereo cameras via SLS-Fusion, can achieve high performance in 3D object detection.
  • Results provide practical guidance for designing cost-efficient 3D object detection systems, indicating that expensive, high-beam LiDAR may not be necessary.