Comparison of Myocardial Ischemia Detection Between Semiconductor and Conventional Anger-type Three-detector SPECT

Objective: Although semiconductor single-photon emission computed tomography (D-SPECT) has been used for myocardial perfusion imaging, few studies have compared its ability to detect myocardial ischemia with that of 3-detector SPECT (GCA9300R). This study used invasive coronary angiography to determine whether the detectability of myocardial ischemia differs between D-SPECT and GCA9300R. Materials and methods: This study included 24 patients who were assessed by coronary angiography within 60 days of myocardial perfusion D-SPECT and GCA9300R. Two nuclear medicine physicians interpreted myocardial perfusion D-SPECT and GCA9300R images with five grades of confidence, then defined regions of ischemia on polar maps. The gold standard was determined by another nuclear cardiology specialist based on integrated assessment of the coronary angiography findings and other clinical information derived from medical charts. The concordance rate and the Cohen kappa (κ) between D-SPECT and GCA9300R were calculated. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and the accuracy of patient-based diagnoses were 66.7%, 91.7%, 89.2%, 72.8%, and 85.5%, respectively, for GCA9300R, and 83.3%, 83.3%, 93.7%, 62.4%, and 83.3%, respectively, for D-SPECT. Interpretations of ischemia did not uncover any significant differences between D-SPECT and GCA9300R. The Cohen κ values of D-SPECT and GCA9300 agreed substantially, moderately and marginally for the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) (0.68), right coronary artery (RCA) (0.43), and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (0.39), respectively. Conclusions: The detectability of myocardial ischemia is comparable between D-SPECT and GCA9300R. Sensitivity is better for D-SPECT than GCA9300R. However, false-positive D-SPECT findings, especially in the apex and inferior wall should be interpreted with caution.