Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Discretionary Atherectomy in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: 2016-2019 National
Karthik Vedantam1, Christian A Torres1, Brad J Martinsen2
1Columbia University Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Heart Institute, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with atherectomy is increasingly used in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided PCI with or without atherectomy appears safe and feasible in this complex patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) frequently coexists with calcified coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Atherectomy is often necessary to facilitate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in AS patients.
- Limited data exists on PCI outcomes with or without atherectomy in AS patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate trends, safety, outcomes, costs, and predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS.
- To assess the feasibility and safety of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided PCI in this population.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2016-2019).
- Identification of patients with AS undergoing PCI with or without atherectomy (Orbital Atherectomy [OA], non-OA) using ICD-10 codes.
- Assessment of temporal trends, safety, outcomes, costs, and MACE correlates using discharge-weighted data.
Main Results:
- Over 45,000 AS patients underwent PCI; 88.6% received PCI-only, 2.3% OA, and 9.1% non-OA atherectomy.
- Significant increases observed in PCI, atherectomy use, and IVUS utilization from 2016-2019.
- Atherectomy cohorts had higher median admission costs compared to PCI-only.
- IVUS-guided PCI with or without atherectomy was associated with decreased odds of MACE.
Conclusions:
- PCI with or without atherectomy in AS patients has significantly increased between 2016 and 2019.
- Overall complication rates were comparable across PCI and atherectomy groups, indicating good safety.
- IVUS-guided PCI, with or without atherectomy, is a feasible and safe strategy for AS patients with complex comorbidities.
Background:
Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) usually have concomitant calcified coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring atherectomy to improve lesion compliance and odds of successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is a paucity of data regarding PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS.
Methods:
The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 2016 through 2019 using ICD-10 codes to identify individuals with AS who underwent PCI with or without atherectomy (Orbital Atherectomy [OA], Rotational or Laser Atherectomy [non-OA]). Temporal trends, safety, outcomes, costs, and correlates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were assessed using discharge weighted data.
Results:
Hospitalizations of 45,420 AS patients undergoing PCI with or without atherectomy were identified and of those, 88.6 %, 2.3 %, and 9.1 % were treated with PCI-only, OA, or non-OA, respectively. There was an increase in PCIs (8855 to 10,885), atherectomy [OA (165 to 300) and non-OA (795 to 1255)], and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use (625 to 1000). The median cost of admission was higher in the atherectomy cohorts ($34,340.77 in OA, $32,306.2 in non-OA) as compared to the PCI-only cohort ($23,683.98). Patients tend to have decreased odds of MACE with IVUS guided atherectomy and PCI.
Conclusions:
This large database revealed a significant increase in PCI with or without atherectomy in AS patients from 2016 to 2019. Considering the complex comorbidities of AS patients, the overall complication rates were well distributed among the different cohorts, suggesting that IVUS guided PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS is feasible and safe.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Angina IV: Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

