An Extremely Inhomogeneous Gross Tumor Dose is Suitable for Volumetric Modulated Arc-Based Radiosurgery with a 5-mm...

Introduction Single or multi-fraction (mf) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an indispensable treatment option for brain metastases (BMs). The integration of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) into linac-based SRS is expected to further enhance efficacy and safety and to expand the indications for the challenging type of BMs. However, the optimal treatment design and relevant optimization method for volumetric modulated arc-based radiosurgery (VMARS) remain unestablished with substantial inter-institutional differences. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the optimal dose distribution suitable for VMARS of BMs, especially regarding dose inhomogeneity of the gross tumor volume (GTV). The GTV boundary, not margin-added planning target volume, was regarded as a basis for planning optimization and dose prescription. Materials and methods This was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM. Eight sphere-shaped objects with diameters of 5-40 mm in 5-mm increments were assumed as GTVs. The treatment system included a 5-mm leaf width multileaf collimator (MLC) Agility® (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and a dedicated planning system Monaco® (Elekta AB). The prescribed dose (PD) was uniformly assigned to just cover 98% of the GTV (D_98%). Three VMARS plans with different dose inhomogeneities of the GTV were generated for each GTV: the % isodose surfaces (IDSs) of GTV D_98%, normalized to 100% at the maximum dose (D_max), were ≤70% (extremely inhomogeneous dose, EIH); ≈80% (inhomogeneous dose, IH); and ≈90% (rather homogeneous dose, RH). VMARS plans were optimized using simple and similar cost functions. In particular, no dose constraint to the GTV D_max was assigned to the EIH plans. Results Intended VMARS plans fulfilling the prerequisites were generated without problems for all GTVs of ≥10 mm, whereas 86.4% was the lowest IDS for the D_98% for 5-mm GTV. Therefore, additional plans for 9- and 8-mm GTVs were generated, which resulted in 68.6% and 75.1% being the lowest IDSs for the D_98% values of 9- and 8-mm GTVs, respectively. The EIH plans were the best in terms of the following: 1) dose conformity, i.e., minimum spillage of PD outside the GTV; 2) moderate, not too excessive, dose attenuation outside the GTV, i.e., appropriate marginal dose 2-mm outside the GTV boundary as a function of GTV size; and 3) lowest dose of the surrounding normal tissue outside the GTV. In contrast, the RH plans were the worst based on all of the aforementioned measures. Conclusions On the assumption of uniform dose assignment to the GTV margin, a very inhomogeneous GTV dose is basically the most suitable for SRS of BMs in terms of 1) superior dose conformity; 2) minimizing the dose of the surrounding normal tissue outside the GTV; and 3) moderate dose spillage margin outside the GTV with a tumor volume-dependent rational increase, i.e., appropriate dose of the common PTV boundary. The concentrically laminated steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary for the EIH plan may also be advantageous for achieving superior tumor response, although early and excessive GTV shrinkage caused by the EIH plan during mfSRS can lead to surrounding brain injury.