Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Birthweight is increasing in the United States
Samantha Mauser1, Vincenzo Berghella2, Emily A Oliver3
1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Insights
US birthweights have increased for full-term neonates (≥39 weeks gestation) but decreased for early term (37 weeks). Rising maternal obesity and diabetes rates may drive these trends, potentially impacting cesarean delivery rates.
Area of Science:
- Perinatology and Neonatal Health
- Public Health and Epidemiology
- Reproductive Medicine
Background:
- Rising rates of maternal obesity and diabetes mellitus have coincided with increased instances of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates.
- The cesarean delivery rate in the US has also increased, with LGA fetuses potentially contributing to this trend.
- This study investigates historical trends in US birthweights to understand their evolution over time.
Discussion:
- While overall mean birthweight remained stable, significant increases were observed for neonates born at 39-42 weeks gestation.
- A notable decrease in birthweight was recorded for neonates born at 37 weeks gestation, with unclear contributing factors.
- Trends in birthweight varied by race and ethnicity, with non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic groups showing higher increases at 39-42 weeks gestation compared to non-Hispanic Whites.
Key Insights:
- Birthweight has significantly increased for neonates born at 39, 40, 41, and 42 weeks gestation between 1972 and 2020.
- Birthweight at 37 weeks gestation showed a statistically significant decrease over the same period.
- Maternal factors such as increased rates of obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus are potential contributors to the observed rise in birthweight for later gestations.
Outlook:
- Increasing birthweights in later gestations may be a contributing factor to persistently high cesarean delivery rates.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons for decreased birthweight at 37 weeks gestation.
- Improved accuracy in gestational age estimation, particularly with first-trimester ultrasounds, may influence future birthweight analyses.
Objective:
The rates of obesity and diabetes mellitus have increased over the last several decades.1,2 This has resulted in a higher number of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates.3 The US cesarean delivery rate has increased over the same period; LGA fetuses may be a contributing factor.4 This study aimed to establish whether birthweights in the United States have increased over time.
Study Design:
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using live birth data of singleton pregnancies from the US National Vital Statistics between January 1972 and December 2020. These data are deidentified and publicly available; therefore, the study was deemed exempt from our institutional review board. Singleton births between 37 0/7 and 42 6/7 weeks of gestation were included. Multiple pregnancies and deliveries which had unknown gestational age or birthweight, were excluded. The mean birthweight by each gestational age week for the years 1972-2020 was calculated at selected years (1972, 1982, 1992, 2002, 2012, 2018, and 2020). Of note, 2018 was included to account for differences in the dataset that might be due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Using R statistical software, a linear model was fit for each gestational age week. A t test was performed to determine whether the slope was statistically different from zero (indicating whether there was a trend of rising or decreasing birthweights over time).
Results:
A total of 19,730,588 individuals met the inclusion criteria. However, <1% of the data were excluded because of missing data. Birthweight at 39, 40, 41, and 42 weeks of gestation showed a statistically significant increase over time (Figure). There was a significant decrease in birthweight at 37 weeks of gestation. Data on Hispanic ethnicity became available in 1992. After 1992, birthweight by race or ethnicity group was examined. Each race or ethnicity group echoes the overall trends observed. However, for 39, 40, 41, and 42 weeks of gestation, the non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic groups have higher increases in birthweight than the non-Hispanic White group. There were fluctuations in the overall combined mean for 37 to 42 weeks of gestation (Table).
Conclusion:
Although the overall mean birthweight did not increase over the study period, it increased for each gestational age week at ≥39 weeks of gestation. The birthweight at 37 weeks of gestation decreased. The reason for the decrease in birthweight is unclear. Contributing factors may include changes in guidelines on the timing of delivery and method of calculation of gestational age. Increases in the rates of obesity and diabetes mellitus could be contributing to the birthweight increase from 39 weeks of gestation.1,2 There was an increase in the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus from 3% to 8% in our study population from 1992 to 2020 and an increase in mean body mass index from 26.3 to 27.5 from 2012 to 2020. The publicly available birthweight data have limitations. Data collection evolved during the study period. The estimates for gestational age have become more accurate with first-trimester dating ultrasounds. In summary, birthweight is increasing among those born from 39 to 42 weeks of gestation. These increasing birthweights may be a factor in persistently high cesarean delivery rates despite national campaigns.5.
More Related Videos
05:44Author Spotlight: Collecting the Brain and Serum from the Same Mice Fetus to Study Brain Tumor Development
Published on: May 17, 2024
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Obesity
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Nature and Nurture
Heritability