Combining generalized modeling and specific modeling in the analysis of ecological networks

The complexity of real food webs involves uncertainty in data and in underlying ecological processes, and modeling approaches deal with these challenges differently. Generalized modeling provides a linear stability analysis without narrow specification of all processes, and conventional dynamical systems models approximate functional forms to discuss trajectories in phase space. This study compares results and ecological interpretations from both methods in four-species ecological networks at steady state. We find that a specific (dynamical systems) model only provides a subset of stability data from the generalized model, which spans many plausible dynamic scenarios, allowing for conflicting results. Nevertheless, both approaches reveal that fixed points become stable when nutrient flows to predators are fettered and even more when the basal growth rate approaches a maximum. The specific model identifies a distinct ecosystem response to bottom-up forcing, the enrichment of lower trophic levels. Enrichment stabilizes a fixed point when basal species are in a resource-deprived environment but destabilizes it if resources become more abundant. The generalized model provides less specific information since infinitely many paths of enrichment are hypothetical. Nevertheless, generalized modeling of ecological systems is a powerful technique that enables a meta analysis of these uncertain complex systems.