Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Leveraging dissemination and implementation science to facilitate adoption of a human nutrition research e-learning course.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2025

Same author

Developing an engaging and accessible clinical research training program for new investigators - ADDENDUM.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2023

Same author

Community-engaged training in informed consent.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2023

Same author

Establishing evidence-based pharmacologic treatments for neonatal abstinence syndrome: A retrospective case study.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2022

Same author

Participant and research team perspectives on the conduct of a remote therapeutic COVID-19 clinical trial: A mixed methods approach.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

Developing an engaging and accessible clinical research training program for new investigators.

Kris M Markman^1,2, Sarah K Brewer¹, Britta Magnuson^1,3,4

¹Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

|April 3, 2023

Summary

A new certificate program effectively trained clinicians in clinical research essentials. Aspiring principal investigators gained confidence and competence in conducting safe, well-designed studies.

Keywords:

Investigator training blended learning curriculum development program evaluation workforce development

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

Area of Science:

Clinical and Translational Science
Medical Education
Research Training

Background:

Clinicians face challenges accessing adequate training for principal investigator roles in clinical and translational research.
Existing training options like degree programs are time-intensive, and online courses may lack engagement or local relevance.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate an eight-module certificate program for aspiring clinician-investigators.
The program aimed to cover good clinical practice, research processes, and regulatory requirements.

Main Methods:

The program was evaluated using pre- and posttest questionnaires.
Clinician learner feedback was collected through a focus group.

Main Results:

Post-program assessments showed increased self-efficacy and confidence in clinical research competencies.
Learners reported the program was engaging, manageable in time commitment, and helpful in identifying research resources.

Conclusions:

The developed certificate program offers a meaningful and efficient approach to clinical trial training for clinicians.
This model addresses the need for accessible and effective training for junior investigators.