Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025
A Mouse Model of Direct Anastomosis via the Prespinal Route for Crossing Nerve Transfer Surgery
Published on: October 19, 2021
Contralateral C7 nerve transfer for severe pediatric brachial plexus injuries: donor site morbidity
Neel D Bhagat1, Jeffrey N Gross2, Joshua M Adkinson2,3
1Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. nbhagat@iu.edu.
Insights
Cross C7 (CC7) nerve transfer is a safe surgical option for pediatric patients with severe brachial plexus injuries (BPI), offering robust donor axons with minimal donor site morbidity.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Microsurgery
Background:
- Pediatric brachial plexus injuries (BPI) can severely impair upper extremity function.
- Pan-plexus injuries (PPI) necessitate donor nerves beyond the brachial plexus for reconstruction.
- The cross C7 (CC7) nerve transfer is a viable, though debated, surgical technique.
Observation:
- This study retrospectively reviewed three pediatric patients (<18 years) undergoing CC7 nerve transfer for BPI between 2021-2022.
- All patients received concomitant additional nerve transfers.
- Donor site morbidity was assessed post-operatively.
Findings:
- Minimal and transient sensory deficits were observed in most patients post-CC7 transfer.
- One patient experienced mild, persistent paresthesia on the donor side.
- No motor deficits were reported at the donor site.
Implications:
- CC7 nerve transfer provides a safe and effective method for augmenting donor motor axons in pediatric PPI.
- This technique offers a valuable reconstructive option for complex brachial plexus injuries in children.
- Further research can validate long-term outcomes and refine surgical protocols.
Background:
Pediatric brachial plexus injuries (BPI) can have a devastating impact on upper extremity function. With localized lesions, nerve grafting and transfers are well-described. However, reconstruction of pan-plexus (C5-T1) injuries (PPI) requires donor nerves outside of the brachial plexus. The cross C7 (CC7) nerve transfer extended with sural nerve grafts to the contralateral recipient nerve offers the advantage of supplying robust donor axons. Though controversial in the West, CC7 transfer is routine in many Asian centers. We present a case series of pediatric patients who underwent CC7 transfer for BPI. Our objective was to catalog donor site morbidity incurred by transferring the C7 nerve root.
Methods:
This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our university.
Inclusion Criteria:
patients under 18 years old that underwent CC7 nerve transfer for BPI at our health system between 2021 and 2022. A chart review was completed to collect demographic and outcomes data.
Results:
Three patients underwent a complete CC7 transfer between 2021 and 2022 for BPI reconstruction. All patients underwent concomitant additional nerve transfers. Post-operative donor site sensory deficits were minimal and transient in all but one patient, who reported mild but persistent paresthesia of the donor side hand with movement of recipient side digits; however, no patients suffered donor site motor deficits (Table 1).
Conclusions:
We conclude that CC7 nerve transfer is a safe surgical option to provide additional donor motor axons for PPI in pediatric patients.
