Time to reconsider post arthroscopic osteonecrosis of the knee: a systematic review

The etiology of post-arthroscopic osteonecrosis of the knee (PAONK) is still unknown. The aims of this systematic review were to analyze the main characteristics of patients who developed osteonecrosis after arthroscopy. We considered for inclusion in the review case reports, case series, retrospective and prospective clinical trial, that involved patients who developed osteonecrosis of the knee within 1 year of arthroscopy for meniscal lesion or anterior cruciate ligament rupture with or without chondropathy. In all cases, there was a pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging that excluded the presence of osteonecrosis. We used the MINORS criteria to estimate the risk of bias. A total of 13 studies that involved 125 patients were included in the review. Only 14 out of 55 patients performed the pre-operative MRI after the "window period", which we considered 6 weeks between the onset of symptoms and positive MRI findings. A diagnosis of PAONK was made for 55 patients within 1 year of surgery. Of these, 29% was treated conservatively, while 71% repeated surgery. Osteonecrosis after knee arthroscopy is a reality and surgeon shouldn't underestimate the persistence or re-emergence of symptoms after arthroscopy. It may be due to subchondral insufficiency fractures in osteopenic bone, without evidence of necrosis. However, there are not elements enough to differentiate clinical and radiological characteristics of PAONK from SPONK. Terminology should be simplified, distinguishing subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee as a precursor of primary osteonecrosis of the knee.