Construct-related validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaires with three and five dimensions: A
Francis Anne Carneiro1, Pedro A Costa1, Isabel Leal1
1William James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.
Abstract:
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is one of the most broadly used questionnaires to evaluate children's psychological adjustment, however its internal structure has been a target of ongoing controversy. Recent studies suggested a three-factor structure of the SDQ, however data is still scarce. The present study used the Multitrait-Multimethod analysis to examine SDQ construct related-validity with three and five dimensions, provided by children, their parents and teachers. A total of 415 participants were recruited from a Portuguese community sample. Both SDQ versions presented good convergence-related validity, with higher values for the five version. Findings from this study suggest that the SDQ with three dimensions could be more suitable as a screening measure of children's psychological adjustment in a community low-risk sample. Nevertheless, the SDQ still needs further psychometric improvements in order to properly collect information from multi-source samples about the prevalence of children's psychological adjustment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Reliability and Validity
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
In contrast, source traits are the...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...


