Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Motor Unit Stimulation

Motor Unit Stimulation

When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A perspective on neuromechanical biomarkers for neurorehabilitation: towards reliable assessment in research and clinical practice.

Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)·2026

Same author

Canonical coherence for the estimation of within- and cross-frequency cortico-kinematic interactions.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

EEG-Based Pain Classification via Sample Selection to Mitigate Subjective Label Bias.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026

Same author

The Transdiagnostic Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Repetitive Negative Thinking in Depression, Anxiety, and Their Comorbidity.

Depression and anxiety·2026

Same author

An EEG correlation framework to study state anxiety and learning under uncertainty.

Journal of neural engineering·2026

Same author

Toward Brain-Computer Interface motor rehabilitation for people with Multiple Sclerosis.

Frontiers in medicine·2026

Same journal

Treadmill exercise rescues motor deficits in parkinsonian mice by modulating striatal D2-MSN activity: evidence from calcium imaging and chemogenetics.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Transfer learning for EEG-based BCIs: a comparative evaluation and optimization of data alignment methods.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026

Same journal

The volatile anesthetic isoflurane causes global suppression of neuronal activity, disrupting hub neuron function in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Associative emotional memory encoding: insights from network stability analysis of an fMRI-driven bilinear dynamics.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026

Same journal

The neurobiological basis of the awe experience in affective disorders: an exploratory EEG study.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Exploring the spiking neural autoencoder: from hyperexcitability to noise-driven compensation.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design

Published on: December 3, 2020

Cortical processing during robot and functional electrical stimulation.

Woosang Cho^1,2, Carmen Vidaurre^3,4, Jinung An⁵

¹Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

|April 7, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The study found that the mu rhythm, a brainwave associated with movement, is significantly affected by muscle kinetics during externally produced finger movements. This has implications for neurorehabilitation and neuromodulation interventions.

Keywords:

functional electrical stimulation kinematic kinetic neurorehabilitation robot somatosensory mu rhythm

More Related Videos

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

Published on: September 23, 2018

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design

Published on: December 3, 2020

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

Published on: September 23, 2018

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Biomedical Engineering
Rehabilitation Science

Background:

Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) includes mu and beta rhythms, reflecting cortical activation during movement.
Understanding SMR changes is crucial for clinical applications in movement disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

Investigate the influence of kinetic and kinematic factors on somatosensory mu and beta rhythms during passive finger movements.
Determine the neural correlates of proprioceptive stimulation for potential use in neurorehabilitation.

Main Methods:

Recorded EEG from 10 healthy volunteers during passive finger extension.
Manipulated kinetic conditions: orthosis-only vs. orthosis with functional electrical stimulation (FES).
Varied kinematic conditions: dynamic extension vs. static holding phase.

Main Results:

Both mu and beta rhythms showed greater suppression during dynamic vs. static extension.
Mu rhythm, but not beta rhythm, demonstrated significant differences between kinetic conditions (with/without FES).
Attention to proprioception modulated the mu rhythm response after transitioning from dynamic to static states.

Conclusions:

Muscle kinetics significantly influence the mu rhythm during externally driven finger movements.
Findings suggest targeted neuromodulation strategies could leverage mu rhythm changes.
Results provide insights for designing more effective neurorehabilitation devices.