Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2025

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Computer assisted interpretation of Tc-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic scintigraphy enhances resident
Andrew T Taylor1, A K M Fazlur Rahman2, Russell D Folks1
1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Objective:
iRENEX is a software module that incorporates scintigraphic and clinical data to interpret 99m Tc- mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) diuretic studies and provide reasons for their conclusions. Our objectives were to compare iRENEX interpretations with those of expert physicians, use iRENEX to evaluate resident performance and determine if iRENEX could improve the diagnostic accuracy of experienced residents.
Methods:
Baseline and furosemide 99m Tc-MAG3 acquisitions of 50 patients with suspected obstruction (mean age ± SD, 58.7 ± 15.8 years, 60% female) were randomly selected from an archived database and independently interpreted by iRENEX, three expert readers and four nuclear medicine residents with one full year of residency. All raters had access to scintigraphic data and a text file containing clinical information and scored each kidney on a scale from +1.0 to -1.0. Scores ≥0.20 represented obstruction with higher scores indicating greater confidence. Scores +0.19 to -0.19 were indeterminate; scores ≤-0.20 indicated no obstruction. Several months later, residents reinterpreted the studies with access to iRENEX. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) quantified agreement.
Results:
The CCC among experts was higher than that among residents, 0.84, versus 0.39, respectively, P < 0.001. When residents reinterpreted the studies with iRENEX, their CCC improved from 0.39 to 0.73, P < 0.001. ROC analysis showed significant improvement in the ability of residents to distinguish between obstructed and non-obstructed kidneys using iRENEX ( P = 0.036).
Conclusion:
iRENEX interpretations were comparable to those of experts. iRENEX reduced interobserver variability among experienced residents and led to better agreement between resident and expert interpretations.
More Related Videos
06:54MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013
08:41Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography