Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Power Flow Problem and Solution01:26

The Power Flow Problem and Solution

278
Power flow problem analysis is fundamental for determining real and reactive power flows in network components, such as transmission lines, transformers, and loads. The power system's single-line diagram provides data on the bus, transmission line, and transformer. Each bus k in the system is characterized by four key variables: voltage magnitude Vk​, phase angle δk​, real power Pk​, and reactive power Qk​. Two of these four variables are inputs, while the...
278
Calculation of Electric Flux01:25

Calculation of Electric Flux

1.9K
Consider the electric field of an oppositely charged, parallel-plate system and an imaginary box between those plates. Let the bottom face of the box be ABCD, and the top face be FGHK. The electric field between the plates is uniform and points from the positive plate toward the negative plate. The calculation of this field's flux through the box's various faces shows that the net flux through the box is zero. Why does the flux cancel out here?
1.9K
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

487
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
487

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Publisher Correction: Clinical evaluation of a new fully automated biometer integrating optical low-coherence reflectometry and Placido-disk topography.

Eye and vision (London, England)·2026
Same author

Clinical evaluation of a new fully automated biometer integrating optical low-coherence reflectometry and Placido-disk topography.

Eye and vision (London, England)·2026
Same author

International consensuses and guidelines on clinical management of highly myopic cataracts: A two-round modified e-Delphi study by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) and the Asia-Pacific Myopia Society (APMS).

Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Planning Adjustment of Toric Capsular Bag Intraocular Lens Axis to Minimise Refractive Cylinder Outcome-A Calculation Concept Based on Vergence Transformations.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Functional Classification of a New IOL Into the Category of Partial Depth of Field: Enhanced IOLs According to the ESCRS Criteria.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same author

Normative Data of Higher-Order Aberrations in Healthy Caucasian Eyes and Their Correlation with Age, Gender, and Spherical Equivalent.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.6K

Accuracy of 24 IOL Power Calculation Methods.

Oleksiy V Voytsekhivskyy, Kenneth J Hoffer, Larysa Tutchenko

    Journal of Refractive Surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)
    |April 11, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary

    Newer intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas demonstrate superior accuracy in predicting postoperative refractions. These advanced methods, including Barrett Universal II and Kane, offer improved outcomes for cataract surgery patients.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Advancing Understanding of Age-Related Lens Stiffness Changes
    05:19

    Author Spotlight: Advancing Understanding of Age-Related Lens Stiffness Changes

    Published on: April 5, 2024

    2.4K
    Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
    04:59

    Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation

    Published on: July 7, 2023

    2.4K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Aug 3, 2025

    Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
    06:55

    Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

    Published on: June 6, 2017

    7.6K
    Author Spotlight: Advancing Understanding of Age-Related Lens Stiffness Changes
    05:19

    Author Spotlight: Advancing Understanding of Age-Related Lens Stiffness Changes

    Published on: April 5, 2024

    2.4K
    Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
    04:59

    Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation

    Published on: July 7, 2023

    2.4K

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Optical Engineering

    Background:

    • Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is crucial for achieving optimal visual outcomes after cataract surgery.
    • Numerous IOL power calculation formulas exist, but their relative accuracy can vary.
    • Continuous advancements in biometric technology and formula algorithms necessitate ongoing evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To rigorously compare the predictive accuracy of 24 different IOL power calculation formulas.
    • To identify the most precise formulas for unoperated eyes undergoing phacoemulsification and IOL implantation.

    Main Methods:

    • Biometric measurements were obtained using the IOLMaster 700.
    • Twenty-four distinct IOL power calculation formulas were evaluated in 300 eyes.
    • Key metrics analyzed included mean prediction error (PE), standard deviation (SD), median absolute error (MedAE), and percentage of eyes within specific PE tolerances.

    Main Results:

    • Statistically significant differences in accuracy were observed among the evaluated formulas.
    • Newly developed formulas, including VRF-G, Kane, Hoffer QST, and Barrett Universal II, exhibited higher accuracy.
    • These advanced formulas achieved the highest percentage of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.50 D.

    Conclusions:

    • Newer generation IOL power calculation formulas provide the most accurate predictions of postoperative refractive outcomes.
    • Formulas such as Barrett Universal II, Hoffer QST, Kane, and VRF-G are recommended for clinical use.
    • The study underscores the importance of utilizing updated formulas for enhanced surgical planning and patient satisfaction.