Paired analysis of ED efficiency for low-acuity children treated by PAs and pediatricians
Kenneth W McKinley1, Jennifer Q Tran, James M Chamberlain
1At Children's National Hospital in Washington, D.C., Kenneth W. McKinley practices in the Emergency Medicine Section of Data Analytics, Jennifer Q. Tran practices in Emergency Medicine and Trauma Services, and James M. Chamberlain and Deena D. Berkowitz practice in the Emergency Medicine Section of Data Analytics. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
Insights
Pediatric emergency department (ED) patients with low-acuity conditions treated by physician assistants (PAs) had a length of stay (LOS) that was not clinically important compared to those seen by pediatricians.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Clinical Operations
Background:
- The role of advanced practice providers, such as physician assistants (PAs), is expanding in pediatric emergency departments (EDs).
- Understanding the impact of PA versus pediatrician care on patient flow is crucial for optimizing ED operations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the length of stay (LOS) for low-acuity pediatric patients treated by PAs versus pediatricians in a large, urban ED.
- To determine if the difference in LOS exceeded a clinically important threshold of 15 minutes.
Main Methods:
- A paired analysis was conducted on data collected between July 2017 and February 2020.
- Length of stay (LOS) was measured for low-acuity pediatric patients during overlapping shifts staffed by both PAs and pediatricians in the ED.
- Mean LOS differences were calculated for shifts with shared staffing.
Main Results:
- The mean shift LOS for children seen by PAs was 160.1 minutes (SD: 48.6).
- The mean shift LOS for children seen by pediatricians was 150 minutes (SD: 47.3).
- The mean LOS for PA-treated patients was 10.1 minutes longer than for pediatrician-treated patients (95% CI: 6.1, 14.1).
Conclusions:
- No clinically important difference in length of stay was identified for low-acuity pediatric patients treated by PAs compared to pediatricians.
- These findings suggest that PAs can manage low-acuity pediatric ED visits efficiently without significantly impacting patient flow.
Objective:
To determine if there was a clinically important difference (15 minutes or more) in length of stay (LOS) for low-acuity pediatric ED patients treated by PAs compared with those treated by pediatricians.
Methods:
Between July 2017 and February 2020, shifts were identified that had shared PA and pediatrician staffing in the low-acuity care area for a large, urban ED. LOS was collected for every patient during the 6 hours of overlap for each shift. Using a paired analysis, we calculated the difference in mean LOS for these shifts.
Results:
Mean shift LOS for children seen by PAs (160.1 minutes, SD: 48.6) was 10.1 minutes longer (95% CI: 6.1, 14.1) than mean shift LOS for children seen by pediatricians (150 minutes, SD: 47.3).
Conclusions:
No clinically important difference in LOS was found for low-acuity children treated by PAs compared with those treated by pediatricians in a large, urban ED.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation


