Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2025

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder
Published on: June 18, 2018
Causal inference indicates that poor responders have similar outcomes with the antagonist protocol compared with
Fernanda Murillo1, Michael Fanton1, Valerie L Baker2
1Alife Health, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Objective:
To use causal inference to investigate whether the flare or antagonist protocol is better for poor responders going through controlled ovarian stimulation.
Design:
A retrospective study.
Setting:
Retrieval cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.
Patients:
Patients in the United States underwent autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from 2014 to 2019 using either the flare or antagonist protocol.
Intervention:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure:
Primary outcomes included oocytes retrieved, fertilized oocytes (2PNs), blastocysts, the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), and cycle cancelation rate.
Results:
After propensity score matching, patients with a predicted poor response (antimüllerian hormone, <0.5) on their first in vitro fertilization cycle had similar outcomes on the antagonist protocol (CLBR of 14.2%, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 13.6%, 14.8%) compared with flare (CLBR of 13.6%, 95% CIs: 12.4%, 14.8%). We evaluated patients undergoing a second cycle after having a poor response (<4 oocytes retrieved) on their first cycle. Patients in the antagonist-to-antagonist group had a similar change in outcomes between the first and second cycles (average CLBR improvement of 13.9%, 95% CIs: 12.1%, 15.6%) compared with the antagonist-to-flare group (average CLBR improvement of 14.4%, 95% CIs: 10.9%, 18.3%). In addition, patients in the flare-to-antagonist group had a similar change in outcomes between the first and second cycles (average CLBR improvement of 10.4%, 95% CIs: 6.6%, 14.5%) compared with the flare-to-flare group (average CLBR improvement of 9.0%, 95% CIs: 5.1%, 13.4%).
Conclusion:
Poor responders have similar outcomes on an antagonist protocol compared with a flare protocol for both the first and second cycles.
More Related Videos
09:29Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
06:37Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Agonist
Agonists can bind to receptors in different ways. Some agonists bind directly to the receptor's active site, mimicking the endogenous...
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Spare Receptors
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview