Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Radiosynthesis, Quality Control, and Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of 68Ga-Labelled Nano Molecules
Published on: October 4, 2024
PET radiotracers for whole-body in vivo molecular imaging of prostatic neuroendocrine malignancies
Dan Cohen1, Shir Hazut Krauthammer2, Ibrahim Fahoum3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel. cohendandan@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Prostatic neuroendocrine malignancies represent a spectrum of diseases. Treatment-induced neuroendocrine differentiation (tiNED) in hormonally treated adenocarcinoma has been the subject of a large amount of recent research. However, the identification of neuroendocrine features in treatment-naïve prostatic tumor raises a differential diagnosis between prostatic adenocarcinoma with de novo neuroendocrine differentiation (dNED) versus one of the primary prostatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs) and carcinomas (P-NECs). While [18F]FDG is being used as the main PET radiotracer in oncologic imaging and reflects cellular glucose metabolism, other molecules labeled with positron-emitting isotopes, mainly somatostatin-analogues labeled with 68Ga and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligands labeled with either 18F or 68Ga, are now routinely used in departments of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, and may be advantageous in imaging prostatic neuroendocrine malignancies. Still, the selection of the preferred PET radiotracer in such cases might be challenging. In the current review, we summarize and discuss published data on these different entities from clinical, biological, and molecular imaging standpoints. Specifically, we review the roles that [18F]FDG, radiolabeled somatostatin-analogues, and radiolabeled PSMA-ligands play in these entities in order to provide the reader with practical recommendations regarding the preferred PET radiotracers for imaging each entity. In cases of tiNED, we conclude that PSMA expression may be low and that [18F]FDG or radiolabeled somatostatin-analogues should be preferred for imaging. In cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma with dNED, we present data that support the superiority of radiolabeled PSMA-ligands. In cases of primary neuroendocrine malignancies, the use of [18F]FDG for imaging high-grade P-NECs and radiolabeled somatostatin-analogues for imaging well-differentiated P-NETs is recommended. KEY POINTS: • The preferred PET radiotracer for imaging prostatic neuroendocrine malignancies depends on the specific clinical scenario and pathologic data. • When neuroendocrine features result from hormonal therapy for prostate cancer, PET-CT should be performed with [18F]FDG or radiolabeled somatostatin-analogue rather than with radiolabeled PSMA-ligand. • When neuroendocrine features are evident in newly diagnosed prostate cancer, differentiating adenocarcinoma from primary neuroendocrine malignancy is challenging but crucial for selection of PET radiotracer and for clinical management.
Insights
Choosing the right PET radiotracer for neuroendocrine prostate cancer is crucial. For treatment-induced neuroendocrine differentiation, [18F]FDG or somatostatin-analogues are preferred over PSMA-ligands.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Oncology
- Pathology
Background:
- Prostatic neuroendocrine malignancies encompass a range of conditions, including treatment-induced neuroendocrine differentiation (tiNED) and de novo neuroendocrine differentiation (dNED).
- Distinguishing between dNED and primary prostatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs) and carcinomas (P-NECs) is critical for accurate diagnosis and management.
- Various PET radiotracers, including [18F]FDG, somatostatin-analogues, and PSMA-ligands, are utilized in imaging, each with potential advantages and challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and discuss published data on prostatic neuroendocrine malignancies from clinical, biological, and molecular imaging perspectives.
- To summarize the roles of [18F]FDG, radiolabeled somatostatin-analogues, and radiolabeled PSMA-ligands in imaging these conditions.
- To provide practical recommendations for selecting the preferred PET radiotracer for each specific entity.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive review of existing literature on prostatic neuroendocrine malignancies.
- Analysis of clinical, biological, and molecular imaging data.
- Comparison of the utility of [18F]FDG, somatostatin-analogues, and PSMA-ligands in different neuroendocrine prostate cancer scenarios.
Main Results:
- For tiNED, PSMA expression may be low, favoring [18F]FDG or somatostatin-analogues over PSMA-ligands.
- Radiolabeled PSMA-ligands demonstrate superiority in imaging prostatic adenocarcinoma with dNED.
- High-grade P-NECs are best imaged with [18F]FDG, while well-differentiated P-NETs benefit from somatostatin-analogues.
Conclusions:
- The optimal PET radiotracer for prostatic neuroendocrine malignancies is contingent upon the specific clinical context and pathological findings.
- In tiNED, [18F]FDG or somatostatin-analogues are recommended over PSMA-ligands.
- Accurate differentiation between adenocarcinoma and primary neuroendocrine malignancy is essential for appropriate PET radiotracer selection and patient management.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...

