Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

224
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
224

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining signed language challenges of early- and late-exposed deaf children.

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2026
Same author

A fMRI neuroimaging dataset of word reading with semantic and phonological localizers in children and adolescents.

Data in brief·2025
Same author

Presenting the Signers' Eye-movements in English Reading (SEER) Corpus: An eye-tracking dataset of reading behaviors by deaf early signers and hearing non-signers.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Identifying text-based factors that contribute to the superior reading efficiency of skilled deaf readers: An eye-tracking study of length, frequency, and predictability.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

The role of perceptual and word identification spans in reading efficiency: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024
Same author

A Case of Specific Language Impairment in a Deaf Signer of American Sign Language.

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.2K

Examining speech-based phonological recoding during reading for adolescent deaf signers.

Frances G Cooley1, David Quinto-Pozos1

  • 1Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|April 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Deaf readers show less reliance on speech-sound decoding when reading compared to hearing readers. Eye-tracking reveals differences in rereading words, indicating unique reading strategies for deaf individuals.

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

426
Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:32

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

22.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.2K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

426
Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:32

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

22.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • The role of phonological decoding in literacy development for deaf and hard-of-hearing readers is debated.
  • Existing literature presents mixed findings on the influence of speech-based processing during reading for this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the extent to which deaf readers utilize speech-based phonological codes during reading.
  • To compare the eye-gaze behaviors of deaf and hearing children when encountering words in sentences.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized eye-tracking technology to record eye-gaze patterns of deaf and hearing primary-school children.
  • Presented target words of three types: correct, homophonic errors, and nonhomophonic errors within sentence contexts.
  • Analyzed eye-gaze fixations during initial word encounters and subsequent rereading.

Main Results:

  • Deaf and hearing readers exhibited different eye-movement behaviors during word rereading, but not during initial encounters.
  • Hearing readers differentiated between homophonic and nonhomophonic errors upon rereading, unlike deaf readers.
  • Deaf readers made fewer regressions to target words, suggesting reduced reliance on error resolution through rereading.

Conclusions:

  • Deaf signers appear to engage in phonological decoding to a lesser degree than hearing readers.
  • The findings suggest that deaf readers may employ different reading strategies, potentially relying less on phonological processing.
  • Eye-tracking data provides insights into the distinct reading mechanisms of deaf individuals.