Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
Published on: June 1, 2015
Dynamic sitting in infants: Limits of stability
Jaya Rachwani1, Victor Santamaria2, Xupeng Ai3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Hunter College, City University of New York, United States.
Insights
Infants reach farther forward than to the side when sitting. Leg movements help increase reach distance, while falling is more common during side reaches, especially for infants with lower motor scores.
Area of Science:
- Developmental motor control
- Infant biomechanics
- Postural stability
Background:
- Limits of stability (LOS) measure dynamic balance by assessing reach distances before loss of balance or base of support change.
- Understanding LOS is crucial for evaluating infant motor development and identifying potential delays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify sitting stability limits in 6- to 10-month-old infants in forward and rightward directions.
- To explore factors influencing these stability limits, such as age, motor skills, and movement strategies.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-one infants (6-10 months) participated in a remote, video-recorded study.
- Caregivers used a toy to encourage reaching until infants lost balance or adjusted their base of support.
- 2D motion analysis (DeepLabCut) and behavioral coding (Datavyu) quantified trunk excursions and postural adjustments.
Main Results:
- Infants demonstrated larger trunk excursions (indicating greater reach) in the forward direction compared to the rightward direction.
- Trunk excursions correlated with sitting experience, and rightward excursions also correlated with Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) scores and age.
- Infants with higher AIMS scores transitioned out of sitting, while those with lower scores sometimes fell, particularly during rightward reaches.
- Increased use of leg movement strategies was associated with greater trunk excursion.
Conclusions:
- Infants' sitting stability limits are direction-dependent, with greater reach capacity forward than laterally.
- The development of sitting stability involves perceiving stability boundaries and adopting anticipatory postural strategies.
- Interventions targeting sitting stability could benefit infants with or at risk of motor delays.
Background:
Limits of stability-defined by the maximum distances a person is willing to reach without falling or changing the base of support-are measures of dynamic balance.
Research Question:
What are infants' sitting stability limits in the forward and right directions?
Methods:
Twenty-one 6- to 10-month old infants participated in this cross-sectional study. To incentivize infants to reach beyond arm's length, caregivers began by holding a toy close to their infants at shoulder height. Caregivers then moved the toy farther away as infants tried to reach for it until infants lost balance, placed their hands on the floor, or transitioned out of sitting. All sessions were conducted via Zoom™ and video-recorded for further analyses using DeepLabCut for 2D pose estimation and Datavyu to determine timings of the reach and to code infants' postural behaviors.
Results:
Infants' trunk excursions in the anterior-posterior plane (for forward reaches) and medio-lateral plane (for rightward reaches) represented their stability limits. Most infants ended the reach by returning to their original sitting position; however, infants with higher Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) scores transitioned out of sitting and infants with lower AIMS scores sometimes fell (mostly during rightward reaching). Trunk excursions were correlated with months of sitting experience. Rightward trunk excursions were also correlated with AIMS scores and age. Overall, infants' trunk excursions were larger in the forward than in the right direction, and such discrepancy was consistent across infants. Lastly, the more often infants adopted movement strategies with their legs (e.g., bending the knees), the greater the trunk excursion they attained.
Significance:
Sitting control entails learning to perceive the boundaries of stability limits and acquiring anticipatory postures to suit the needs of the task. Tests and interventions that target sitting stability limits could be beneficial for infants with or at risk of motor delays.
More Related Videos
08:24Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
08:40Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
Published on: November 11, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Indeterminate Structure
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Attachment
Constraints and Statical Determinacy