Science resource inequalities viewed as less wrong when girls are disadvantaged
Riley N Sims1, Amanda R Burkholder2, Melanie Killen1
1Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA.
Children and adults show subtle gender biases, evaluating science resource inequalities less negatively when girls are disadvantaged. Moral reasoning reduces inequality, while group-focused reasoning perpetuates it.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Gender Studies
Background:
- Children prioritize moral concerns over ingroup preferences in resource distribution.
- Existing research highlights children's complex responses to resource inequalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate children's and young adults' evaluations and resource allocation decisions in a science inequality context.
- To examine how gender and age influence perceptions and rectifications of science resource disparities.
Main Methods:
- Participants (5-11-year-olds and young adults) evaluated and allocated science supplies based on vignettes depicting gender-based inequalities.
- Justifications for decisions were analyzed to identify reasoning patterns (moral vs. group-focused).
Main Results:
- Inequalities disadvantaging boys were evaluated more negatively and rectified more often than those disadvantaging girls.
- Younger children (5-6 years) and male participants showed greater rectification when boys were disadvantaged.
- Moral reasoning correlated with negative evaluations and rectification; group-focused reasoning correlated with positive evaluations and perpetuation of inequalities.
Conclusions:
- Subtle gender biases exist in evaluating and addressing science resource inequalities from childhood to adulthood.
- These biases can contribute to the perpetuation of gender-based disparities in science.
- Reasoning type significantly impacts the perception and resolution of resource inequalities.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female...
