Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025
Rapid Whole-Mount High-Resolution Imaging of Small Animal Vasculature for Quantitative Studies
Published on: May 23, 2025
Influence of vascular imaging acquisition at local stroke centers on workflows in the drip-n-ship model: a RACECAT
Alan Flores1, Alvaro Garcia-Tornel2, Laia Seró1
1Stroke Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII. Institut d'Investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Background:
The influence of vascular imaging acquisition on workflows at local stroke centers (LSCs) not capable of performing thrombectomy in patients with a suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke remains uncertain. We analyzed the impact of performing vascular imaging (VI+) or not (VI- at LSC arrival on variables related to workflows using data from the RACECAT Trial.
Objective:
To compare workflows at the LSC among patients enrolled in the RACECAT Trial with or without VI acquisition.
Methods:
We included patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke who were enrolled in the RACECAT Trial, a cluster-randomized trial that compared drip-n-ship versus mothership triage paradigms in patients with suspected acute LVO stroke allocated at the LSC. Outcome measures included time metrics related to workflows and the rate of interhospital transfers and thrombectomy among transferred patients.
Results:
Among 467 patients allocated to a LSC, vascular imaging was acquired in 277 patients (59%), of whom 198 (71%) had a LVO. As compared with patients without vascular imaging, patients in the VI+ group were transferred less frequently as thrombectomy candidates to a thrombectomy-capable center (58% vs 74%, P=0.004), without significant differences in door-indoor-out time at the LSC (median minutes, VI+ 78 (IQR 69-96) vs VI- 76 (IQR 59-98), P=0.6). Among transferred patients, the VI+ group had higher rate of thrombectomy (69% vs 55%, P=0.016) and shorter door to puncture time (median minutes, VI+ 41 (IQR 26-53) vs VI- 54 (IQR 40-70), P<0.001).
Conclusion:
Among patients with a suspected LVO stroke initially evaluated at a LSC, vascular imaging acquisition might improve workflow times at thrombectomy-capable centers and reduce the rate of futile interhospital transfers. These results deserve further evaluation and should be replicated in other settings and geographies.
