Adaptive Immunity in Genitourinary Cancers
Madhuri Koti1, Trinity Bivalacqua2, Peter C Black3
1Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Context:
While urothelial and renal cell cancers have exhibited modest responses to novel immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed death ligand 1 and its receptor, response rates in patients with prostate cancer have remained poor. The factors underlying suboptimal outcomes observed in patients treated with novel immunotherapies are still to be resolved.
Objective:
To review the literature and describe the key adaptive immune physiological events associated with cancer progression and therapeutic response in genitourinary (GU) cancers.
Evidence Acquisition:
We performed a nonsystematic, collaborative narrative review to highlight recent advancements leading to the current state of knowledge on the critical mediators of antitumor adaptive immunity to GU cancers. Further, we discuss the findings on the pre- and post-treatment immunological events that either are unique to each of the three cancer types or exhibit overlapping clinical associations.
Evidence Synthesis:
Aging-associated immune function decline is a major factor underlying poor outcomes observed in patients treated with both conventional and novel immunotherapies. Other cancer immunobiological aspects associated with suboptimal responses in GU cancers include the overall tumor mutational burden, mutations in specific tumor suppressor/DNA damage repair genes (KDM6A, PTEN, STAG2, TP53, ATM, and BRCA2), and abundance of multiple functional states of adaptive immune cells and their spatiotemporal localization within the tumor immune microenvironment. Understanding these mechanisms may potentially lead to the development of prognostic and predictive biomarkers such as immune cell infiltration profiles and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) that associate with variable clinical outcomes depending on the nature of the novel immunotherapeutic approach. Implementation of newer immune-monitoring technologies and improved preclinical modeling systems will augment our understanding of the host and tumor intrinsic factors contributing to the variability of responses to immunotherapies.
Conclusions:
Despite the tremendous progress made in the understanding of dynamic and static adaptive immune elements within the tumor immune landscape, several knowledge gaps remain. A comprehensive knowledge thus gained will lead to precision immunotherapy, improved drug sequencing, and a therapeutic response.
Patient Summary:
We performed a collaborative review by a diverse group of experts in the field to examine our understanding of the events and crosstalk between cancer cells and the patient's immune system that are associated with responses to novel immunotherapies. An evolving understanding of tumor-intrinsic and host-related immune alterations, both before and after therapy, will aid in the discovery of promising markers of responses to immunotherapy as well as the development of unique therapeutic approaches for the management of genitourinary cancers.
Insights
Immune checkpoint inhibitors show poor response in prostate cancer. Factors like aging, tumor mutations, and immune cell states impact outcomes, necessitating further research for better immunotherapy strategies in genitourinary cancers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Genitourinary Cancers
Background:
- Urothelial and renal cell cancers respond modestly to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
- Prostate cancer exhibits poor response rates to novel immunotherapies, with underlying factors yet to be fully elucidated.
- Understanding adaptive immunity is crucial for improving ICI efficacy in genitourinary (GU) cancers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the literature on adaptive immune events in GU cancer progression and therapeutic response.
- To describe key physiological events influencing antitumor immunity in GU cancers.
- To highlight advancements in understanding mediators of adaptive immunity against GU cancers.
Main Methods:
- A nonsystematic, collaborative narrative review was conducted.
- Literature was reviewed to identify critical mediators of antitumor adaptive immunity in GU cancers.
- Pre- and post-treatment immunological events were discussed for urothelial, renal cell, and prostate cancers.
Main Results:
- Aging-associated immune decline significantly impacts immunotherapy outcomes.
- Tumor mutational burden, specific gene mutations (e.g., KDM6A, PTEN, TP53), and immune cell localization influence response.
- Immune cell infiltration profiles and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) may serve as prognostic and predictive biomarkers.
Conclusions:
- Significant knowledge gaps remain in understanding the tumor immune landscape for GU cancers.
- Further research into host and tumor factors will improve immunotherapy efficacy.
- A comprehensive understanding will enable precision immunotherapy, optimized drug sequencing, and improved therapeutic responses.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System I: Health History
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Special Features of Adaptive Immunity
The primary cell types involved in adaptive immunity are T cells and B cells. Each type has a unique role in defending the body against pathogens. T cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity. They identify and eliminate infected cells directly,...


