Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

74.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
74.1K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.8K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.8K
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

487
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
487
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

616
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
616
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

237
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
237
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Posttraumatic growth after stroke: A longitudinal observational study.

Rehabilitation psychology·2025
Same author

Parallel analysis with categorical variables: Impact of category probability proportions on dimensionality assessment accuracy.

Psychological methods·2018
Same journal

BAYESIAN MIXED MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING FOR AUDITORY PROCESSING.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 2, 2025

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

673

Advantages of Using Unweighted Approximation Error Measures for Model Fit Assessment.

Dirk Lubbe1

  • 1Section for Psychological Methods, Department of Psychology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Am Alten Gymnasium 1-3, 16816,  Neuruppin, Germany. Dirk.Lubbe@mhb-fontane.de.de.

Psychometrika
|April 18, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New fit indices for latent variable models offer improved interpretability and consistency across different measurement levels. These unweighted indices provide a more stable assessment of model fit compared to traditional methods like RMSEA and CFI.

Keywords:
approximation errordiscrepancy functiongoodness of fitstructural equation model

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

833

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 2, 2025

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

673
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

833

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Fit indices like RMSEA and CFI are crucial for evaluating latent variable models.
  • Current indices rely on noncentrality parameter estimates, which can be complex to interpret and vary with measurement levels (e.g., categorical vs. metric).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and investigate new fit indices for latent variable models that are independent of specific weighting functions.
  • To address the interpretability and measurement-level dependency issues of existing fit indices.

Main Methods:

  • Considered approaches for obtaining unweighted approximation discrepancy estimates.
  • Calculated new fit indices analogous to RMSEA and CFI using these unweighted estimates.
  • Investigated the finite sample properties of the new indices via simulation studies.

Main Results:

  • The newly developed fit indices consistently estimate their true values.
  • Unlike traditional indices, the new indices yield the same values for both metric and categorical variables.
  • Demonstrated advantages in interpretability and consistency across measurement types.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed unweighted fit indices offer a more robust and interpretable alternative for assessing latent variable model fit.
  • These indices provide a unified assessment regardless of whether variables are metric or categorical.
  • Further research into cutoff criteria for these new indices is warranted.