Influence of Modified Instructions on Locomotion Subtest Scores Using the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second

Deanne Fay1, Emily Schubbe, Andy Albrecht

  • 1A.T. Still University (Dr Fay), Mesa, Arizona; Central Michigan University (Dr Schubbe), Mount Pleasant, Michigan; Spotlight Pediatric Therapy (Dr Albrecht), Phoenix, Arizona.

Insights

Modifying verbal and visual cues on the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2) Locomotion subtest significantly impacts scores in young children. These findings suggest caution when reporting scores after instruction changes.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Motor Development
  • Pediatric Assessment

Background:

  • The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2) is a widely used tool for assessing motor skills in children.
  • Standardized administration is crucial for the validity of normative scores.
  • Understanding the impact of instructional modifications is essential for accurate assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if altering verbal and visual cues in task instructions affects scores on the PDMS-2 Locomotion subtest.
  • To determine score differences in children aged 2.5 to 5 years when using modified versus standardized instructions.

Main Methods:

  • The PDMS-2 Locomotion subtest was administered twice to 37 children within a 2-10 day interval.
  • Participants were assigned to groups receiving standardized and modified instructions, with order counterbalanced.
  • Instructions varied in verbal and visual cues used to clarify task requirements.

Main Results:

  • Instruction type significantly influenced Locomotion subtest scores.
  • A medium effect size was observed, indicating a meaningful difference in scores.
  • No significant interactions were found between instruction type and age or test order.

Conclusions:

  • Modifications to verbal and visual cues in PDMS-2 instructions alter Locomotion subtest scores in typically developing children.
  • Results support the recommendation against reporting normative scores if testing modifications were employed.
  • This highlights the importance of strict adherence to standardized procedures for valid assessment outcomes.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos