Related Experiment Videos
Attributional patterns in depression and euthymia
Archives of General Psychiatry
|June 1, 1986
Summary
Depressed individuals exhibit biased self-evaluations, attributing more responsibility for negative outcomes. Nondepressed individuals show a positive bias, evaluating successes more favorably than failures.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychopathology
Background:
- Self-evaluation is crucial for mental well-being.
- Depression is often associated with negative self-perception and cognitive distortions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how success and failure experiences influence self-evaluations in depressed versus nondepressed individuals.
- To compare attributional patterns for positive and negative outcomes across different groups.
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted, contrasting depressed and nondepressed students, and depressed patients with schizophrenic patients and normal controls.
- Attributions for positive and negative outcomes were assessed using a story rating task and a behavioral task.
Main Results:
- Nondepressed (euthymic) subjects showed a bias, attributing greater control, responsibility, and intensity to positive events compared to negative ones.
- Depressed subjects displayed this positive cognitive bias to a lesser extent or not at all.
- Depressed patients exhibited an inverse, self-punitive bias, assigning more responsibility for negative outcomes than for positive ones.
Conclusions:
- Depression is linked to altered self-evaluation biases, deviating from the positive bias seen in nondepressed individuals.
- The findings highlight distinct cognitive distortions in depression, including a potential self-punitive attributional style.