Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
Clinical evaluation of thermo-viscous and sonic fill-activated bulk fill composite restorations
Kholood E Morsy1, Mirvat M Salama2, Thuraia M Genaid2
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt, morsykhlood@gmail.com.
Purpose:
To evaluate the clinical performance of VisCalor and SonicFill versus the conventionally applied bulk fill composite restorations in Class I cavities over 18-month follow-up periods.
Methods:
60 posterior teeth were used in this study in 20 patients (age ranging from 25-40). They were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=20) based on the type of restorative material employed. Each resin composite restorative system with the recommended manufacturer's adhesive was applied and cured according to the manufacturer's instructions. All restorations were evaluated clinically at baseline (after 24 hours), 6, 12, and 18 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) by two examiners for retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, color match, and anatomical form.
Results:
All tested groups exhibited no significant difference regarding all the clinical evaluation criteria at all evaluation periods, except for marginal adaptation and discoloration. Marginal changes (Bravo score) were detected only after 12 months in 15% of Filtek bulk fill restorations (Group 1) only while all VisCalor bulk fill restorations in Group 2 and SonicFill 2 restorations in Group 3 recorded 100% Alpha scoring, with no statistically significant difference among the groups (P= 0.050). After 18 months, Bravo scores increased to 30% in Group 1, while 5 and 10% Bravo scores were recorded in restorations of Groups 2 and 3, respectively with a statistically significant difference (P= 0.049) among them. Marginal discoloration was observed after 12 months in Group 1 only, however, no statistically significant difference was found among the groups (P= 0.126). At 18 months, all tested groups had a statistically significant difference between them (P= 0.027).
Clinical Significance:
Reducing the composite viscosity either by thermo-viscous technology or by sonic activation can improve the material adaptation to the cavity walls and margins, thus improving the clinical performance.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
05:42Detection and Removal of Tooth-Colored Composite Resin Using the Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique
Published on: July 27, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...