Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
Published on: September 8, 2023
Optimization of the multivariate polynomial public key for quantum safe digital signature
Randy Kuang1, Maria Perepechaenko2
1Quantropi Inc, Ottawa, ON, K1Z 8P8, Canada. randy.kuang@quantropi.com.
Abstract:
Kuang, Perepechaenko, and Barbeau recently proposed a novel quantum-safe digital signature algorithm called Multivariate Polynomial Public Key or MPPK/DS. The key construction originated with two univariate polynomials and one base multivariate polynomial defined over a ring. The variable in the univariate polynomials represents a plain message. All but one variable in the multivariate polynomial refer to noise used to obscure private information. These polynomials are then used to produce two multivariate product polynomials, while excluding the constant term and highest order term with respect to the message variable. The excluded terms are used to create two noise functions. Then four produced polynomials, masked with two randomly chosen even numbers over the ring, form the Public Key. The two univariate polynomials and two randomly chosen numbers, behaving as an encryption key to obscure public polynomials, form the Private Key. The verification equation is derived from multiplying all of the original polynomials together. MPPK/DS uses a special safe prime to prevent private key recovery attacks over the ring, forcing adversaries to solve for private values over a sub-prime field and lift the solutions to the original ring. Lifting entire solutions from the sub-prime field to the ring is designed to be difficult based on security requirements. This paper intends to optimize MPPK/DS to reduce the signature size by a fifth. We added extra two private elements to further increase the complexity of the private key recovery attack. However, we show in our newly identified optimal attack that these extra private elements do not have any effect on the complexity of the private recovery attack due to the intrinsic feature of MPPK/DS. The optimal key-recovery attack reduces to a Modular Diophantine Equation Problem or MDEP with more than one unknown variables for a single equation. MDEP is a well-known NP-complete problem, producing a set with many equally-likely solutions, so the attacker would have to make a decision to choose the correct solution from the entire list. By purposely choosing the field size and the order of the univariate polynomials, we can achieve the desired security level. We also identified a new deterministic attack on the coefficients of two univariate private polynomials using intercepted signatures, which forms a overdetermined set of homogeneous cubic equations. To the best of our knowledge, the solution to such a problem is to brute force search all unknown variables and verify the obtained solutions. With those optimizations, MPPK/DS can offer extra security of 384 bit entropy at 128 bit field with a public key size being 256 bytes and signature size 128 or 256 bytes using SHA256 or SHA512 as the hash function respectively.
Related Concept Videos
Norton's Theorem
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
Bulk Modulus
Biot-Savart Law: Problem-Solving
Consider a mobile phone battery bank as a source of steady current, which flows through the wire connected between the two. What is the magnitude of the magnetic field created by this current at a field point P?
To estimate the magnitude of the total magnetic field, we first consider a small current element of length dl, at a distance r from the field point. Now the following...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

