Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
Patient-tailored risk assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease using Rubidium-82 PET-based myocardial flow
S S Koenders1,2, J A van Dalen3, P L Jager4
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands. skoenders93@gmail.com.
Insights
This study estimates obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD) probability using Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Combining visual assessment and MFR improves individual risk prediction for better treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD) diagnosis often relies on invasive procedures.
- Non-invasive assessment using Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) offers an alternative.
- Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is a key metric derived from Rb-82 PET, reflecting coronary microvascular function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD) in individual patients.
- To assess the role of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured by Rb-82 PET in conjunction with visual scan interpretation.
- To determine how MFR influences oCAD probability across different visual scan classifications (normal, small defect, large defect).
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 1519 consecutive patients without prior CAD history undergoing Rb-82 PET/CT was analyzed.
- PET images were visually assessed and categorized as normal, small defect (5-10%), or large defect (>10%).
- The probability of oCAD was calculated as a function of MFR for each category, with invasive coronary angiography serving as the primary endpoint.
Main Results:
- In patients with visually normal scans, oCAD probability increased from 1% to 10% as MFR decreased from 2.1 to 1.3.
- For scans with small defects, oCAD probability rose from 13% to 40% with decreasing MFR (2.1 to 0.7).
- Scans with large defects showed a steeper increase in oCAD probability, from 45% to over 70% as MFR decreased from 2.1 to 0.7.
Conclusions:
- Visual PET interpretation alone can distinguish patients with >10% oCAD risk.
- However, MFR significantly impacts individual oCAD risk assessment.
- Combining visual interpretation with MFR provides a more accurate individual risk stratification, potentially guiding treatment decisions.
Introduction:
Our aim was to estimate the probability of obstructive CAD (oCAD) for an individual patient as a function of the myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured with Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET in patients with a visually normal or abnormal scan.
Materials And Methods:
We included 1519 consecutive patients without a prior history of CAD referred for rest-stress Rb-82 PET/CT. All images were visually assessed by two experts and classified as normal or abnormal. We estimated the probability of oCAD for visually normal scans and scans with small (5%-10%) or larger defects (> 10%) as function of MFR. The primary endpoint was oCAD on invasive coronary angiography, when available.
Results:
1259 scans were classified as normal, 136 with a small defect and 136 with a larger defect. For the normal scans, the probability of oCAD increased exponentially from 1% to 10% when segmental MFR decreased from 2.1 to 1.3. For scans with small defects, the probability increased from 13% to 40% and for larger defects from 45% to > 70% when segmental MFR decreased from 2.1 to 0.7.
Conclusion:
Patients with > 10% risk of oCAD can be distinguished from patients with < 10% risk based on visual PET interpretation only. However, there is a strong dependence of MFR on patient's individual risk of oCAD. Hence, combining both visual interpretation and MFR results in a better individual risk assessment which may impact treatment strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

