Modelling the relative cost-effectiveness of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine compared to investment in vector control

Hillary M Topazian1, Nora Schmit1, Ines Gerard-Ursin1

  • 1MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Vaccine
|April 20, 2023
PubMed

Insights

The RTS,S malaria vaccine is cost-effective at under $9.30 per dose in most scenarios. Scaling up insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) are key priorities.

Area of Science:

  • Global Health
  • Infectious Disease Epidemiology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • The World Health Organization recommends the RTS,S/AS01 (RTS,S) malaria vaccine for children in high-transmission areas.
  • Limited vaccine supply necessitates evaluating its cost-effectiveness against existing malaria control interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model the cost-effectiveness of the RTS,S vaccine in diverse sub-Saharan African settings.
  • To compare RTS,S implementation with scaling up insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), next-generation ITNs, and seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC).

Main Methods:

  • An individual-based mathematical model simulating Plasmodium falciparum transmission was used.
  • Cost-effectiveness was analyzed across various rainfall patterns, ITN coverage, treatment rates, and parasite prevalence.
  • RTS,S administration strategies were compared against enhanced ITN use and SMC introduction.

Main Results:

  • RTS,S was cost-effective (≤$9.30/dose) in over 90% of modeled scenarios.
  • High ITN coverage (≥60%) and/or SMC presence reduced the cost-effectiveness threshold for RTS,S.
  • Layering RTS,S onto existing interventions significantly reduced malaria cases.

Conclusions:

  • RTS,S effectively reduces malaria cases and deaths, even alongside other interventions.
  • Prioritizing scale-up of ITNs, SMC, and next-generation nets is crucial in eligible settings for cost-effectiveness.
Abstract