Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025
Monitoring Lung Function with Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: September 6, 2024
Regional peak flow as a novel approach to assess regional pulmonary mechanics by electrical impedance tomography: an
Sebastiaan A M de Jongh1, Serge J H Heines1, Frans H C de Jongh2
1Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Background:
Spontaneous breathing efforts during mechanical ventilation are a widely accepted weaning approach for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. These efforts can be too vigorous, possibly inflicting lung and diaphragm damage. Higher positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels can be used to lower the magnitude of vigorous breathing efforts. Nevertheless, PEEP titrating tools are lacking in spontaneous mechanical ventilation (SMV). Therefore, the aim is to develop an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) algorithm for quantifying regional lung mechanics independent from a stable plateau pressure phase based on regional peak flow (RPF) by EIT, which is hypothetically applicable in SMV and to validate this algorithm in patients on controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV).
Methods:
The RPF algorithm quantifies a cumulative overdistension (ODRPF) and collapse (CLRPF) rate and is validated in a prospective cohort of mechanically ventilated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients on CMV. ODRPF and CLRPF are compared with compliance-based cumulative overdistension (ODP500) and collapse (CLP500) rates from the Pulmovista 500 EIT device at multiple PEEP levels (PEEP 10 cmH2O to PEEP 24 cmH2O) in EIT measurements from CMV patients by linear mixed models, Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results:
Seventy-eight patients were included. Linear mixed models revealed an association between ODRPF and ODP500 of 1.02 (0.98-1.07, P<0.001) and between CLRPF and CLP500 of 0.93 (0.80-1.05, P<0.001). ICC values ranged from 0.78 to 0.86 (P<0.001) for ODRPF and ODP500 and from 0.70 to 0.85 (P<0.001) for CLRPF and CLP500 (PEEP 10 to PEEP 24). The mean bias between ODRPF and ODP500 in these PEEP levels ranged from 0.80% to 4.19% and from -1.31% to 0.13% between CLRPF and CLP500.
Conclusions:
A RPF approach for quantifying regional lung mechanics showed a moderate to good agreement in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related ARDS patients on CMV compared to the compliance-based approach. This, in addition to being independent of a plateau pressure phase, indicates that the RPF approach is a valid method to explore for quantifying regional lung mechanics in SMV.
