Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
1.8K
Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|April 21, 2023
Summary
This study found that a new dynamic surgical navigation system offers comparable accuracy to a gold standard for zygomatic implant placement. This innovative approach avoids the need for invasive markers and pre-operative imaging.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Dental Implantology
- Surgical Navigation Technology
Background:
- Zygomatic implants (ZIs) are a viable solution for patients with significant maxillary bone loss.
- Surgical navigation systems can potentially improve the accuracy and safety of ZI placement.
- Evaluating novel navigation systems is crucial for advancing implant dentistry.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of a new dynamic surgical navigation system with a minimally invasive registration guide against a conventional navigation approach for zygomatic implant placement.
- To assess deviations in implant position and angulation between the two navigation systems.
Main Methods:
- An in vitro study using 10 3D-printed models based on CBCT scans of edentulous patients.
- Placement of 40 zygomatic implants using a split-mouth design, testing both the new system (test group) and a gold standard (control group).
- Comparison of planned versus placed implant positions using offset basis, offset apical, and angular deviation measurements after CBCT analysis.
Main Results:
- Both navigation systems demonstrated comparable accuracy in zygomatic implant placement, with no significant differences in deviations (offset basis, offset apical, angular deviation).
- The test group achieved an offset basis of 1.43 ± 0.55 mm, offset apical of 1.81 ± 0.68 mm, and angular deviation of 2.32 ± 1.59 degrees.
- The control group showed similar results: 1.48 ± 0.57 mm (offset basis), 1.76 ± 0.62 mm (offset apical), and 2.57 ± 1.51 degrees (angular deviation).
Conclusions:
- Dynamic surgical navigation systems, even with minimally invasive registration, provide acceptable accuracy for zygomatic implant placement.
- The novel system eliminates the need for pre-interventional radiologic imaging and invasive fiducial markers, simplifying the procedure.
- This technology offers a promising advancement for accurate and less invasive zygomatic implant surgery.

