Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
Validation of the Music Therapy Assessment Tool for Awareness in Disorders of Consciousness With the Coma Recovery
Wendy L Magee1, Ajit Narayanan2, Rebecca O'Connor3
1Boyer College of Music and Dance, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Objective:
To examine (1) the concurrent validity of the Music Therapy Assessment Tool for Awareness in Disorders of Consciousness (MATADOC) with the criterion standard Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) for outcomes of awareness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDoC), (2) the relationship between MATADOC items and CRS-R function subscales in similar domains, and (3) determine if items/function subscales measure different constructs.
Design:
A prospective multicentric blinded study with repeated concurrent measures.
Setting:
Three inpatient rehabilitation units.
Participants:
Convenience sample of 74 adults with PDoC (N=74).
Main Outcome Measures:
The MATADOC protocol elicits behavioral responsiveness using live music in 5 tasks. A total score ranges 0-10 scoring behaviors across 14-items. The CRS-R uses a language-based protocol and scores observed responses ranging from 0-23 in 6 function subscales. Both measures were delivered at 4 concurrent time points over 2 weeks.
Results:
Fair (κ=0.238, P=.006) ranging to moderate (κ=0.419, P<.001) significant agreement was found between CRS-R and MATADOC diagnostic outcomes. Fair-borderline moderate significant agreement was found for overall diagnostic outcomes across all diagnostic categories (κ=0.397, P=.001). There was moderate significant agreement between measures for motor scores (0.551≤κ≤0.571, P<.001) and visual outcomes (0.192≤κ≤0.415, .001≤P<.005) but no agreement for item/function subscale outcomes assessing auditory responsiveness. Exploratory factor analysis of all items showed 2 factors, suggesting that MATADOC and CRS-R measure the same underlying latent variable (awareness) in different ways and could complement each other for diagnosis and intervention purposes. This was supported by scale analysis, which showed increased reliability when the 2 scales are used together rather than separately.
Conclusions:
Unlike the CRS-R, the music-based MATADOC scores auditory localization for complexity of response and categorizes these behaviors as conscious rather than reflexive. The MATADOC may supplement the CRS-R, having a particular role in interdisciplinary programming for providing a more robust assessment of auditory responsiveness because of using nonverbal musical stimuli.
