Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Correlation between bone density measurements on CT or MRI versus DEXA scan: A systematic review
Amer Ahmad1, Charles H Crawford1,2, Steven D Glassman1,2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 550 S. Jackson St., 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, KY 40202 USA.
Computed tomography (CT) bone density measurements show stronger correlations with Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, both modalities offer only moderate correlation with DEXA, suggesting careful interpretation for bone mineral density assessment.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Imaging Science
- Orthopedic Surgery and Spine Research
- Bone Densitometry and Osteoporosis Research
Background:
- Emerging computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for bone density assessment are increasingly discussed in spine surgery literature.
- The correlation between these novel imaging-derived bone mineral density (BMD) measurements and traditional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an updated systematic review evaluating the correlations between bone mineral density (BMD) assessed via CT or MRI and DEXA measurements.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of studies published between 2011 and 2021.
- Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting correlations between CT-Hounsfield Units (HU) or MRI measurements and DEXA t-scores or BMD of the lumbar spine or hip.
Main Results:
- Twenty-five studies (15 CT, 10 MRI) involving 2,745 patients were analyzed.
- Pooled correlation coefficients indicated moderate agreement: CT-HU versus spine DEXA (r²=0.60), CT-HU versus hip DEXA (r²=0.50), and MRI versus spine/hip DEXA (r²≈-0.41 to -0.44).
- In spine surgery cohorts, pooled correlations between CT and DEXA were r²=0.64.
Conclusions:
- Computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield Units (HU) demonstrate stronger correlations with Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements.
- Both CT and MRI provide only moderate correlations with DEXA, necessitating cautious interpretation for bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation.
- The predictive value of CT and MRI for mechanical complications and clinical outcomes in spine surgery patients requires further investigation, especially in degenerative spine populations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Bone Structure
Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...

